[Ouroboros]

Goathead, on 29 July 2010 - 01:00 AM, said:

I think perhaps you could learn from this: http://www.timecube.com/

Raging lunatic. Maybe even schizophrenic.

And a crazy man's words are relevant how?

Perhaps you could learn from taking a class in biological anthropology?

[Goathead]

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

And a crazy man's words are relevant how?

Perhaps you could learn from taking a class in biological anthropology?

So all you can do is throw insults instead of address the point? Why don't you go back to your high-school English class? They might teach you some debating tactics.
In the meantime, I feel that there is more evidence, (and from more reputable sources) for Timecube than there is for your evolution if this is the best you can argue it. Thanks.

[Ouroboros]

Goathead, on 29 July 2010 - 07:37 PM, said:

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

And a crazy man's words are relevant how?

Perhaps you could learn from taking a class in biological anthropology?

So all you can do is throw insults instead of address the point? Why don't you go back to your high-school English class? They might teach you some debating tactics.

I got A+ in honors English classes in college, up to the highest level. But that doesn't matter because when I debate here, I'm playing around. It's not a formal debate. Especially when I'm debating with a troll like you. I have not problem calling what I see even if it offends you.

Besides, the "crazy man" was a reference to the author of "Time Cube," not you. He's crazy. But as it so happens, I think you're a bit of a wanker too. You love the attention you get, don't you?

I've taken classes and learned how to research and evaluate the quality of sources, and his website screams crazy. So I'm actually using the skills, knowledge, and training I got in multiple classes involving research and study of source materials.

Quote

In the meantime, I feel that there is more evidence, (and from more reputable sources) for Timecube than there is for your evolution if this is the best you can argue it. Thanks.

You wanna bet?

I have access to a couple of million research papers and documents through the college campus library.

And I could talk to the professors in anthropology and biology to see if they agree with you.

Here is a quote from the Cube man's website:

Quote

Americans are dumb, educated ONE

stupid and they worship ONEism Evil.

It is not immoral to kill believers, for the stupid bastards EVOLVE from son

or daughter who precedes them. NOT one damn human adult has ever been

created - for ONLY babies are CREATED - and every adult has within them the LIFE given by children who DIE to give-up their lives to their parent

image - so their mom or Dad can live. Adults are EVIL to deny they evolved from children - and claim their adult EGO image is a god likeness. Such damn evil AMERICANS should have their tongue cut out for the heinous hoax they are perpetrating upon their own children. I know now why the Jews

deserved their holocaust - worshipping their own adult EGO image as a damn god whil ignoring and betraying the very children who sacrifice their LIFE

so their Moms and Dads could Live. There is nothing godly about stupid

and evil adults who betray their own children who gave them Life. I AM

WISER THAN ANY DAMN MAN OR GOD WHO EVER EXISTED. IF THE

HALF AND HALF CO-CREATED

JESUS RETURNS TO EARTH, I WILL PERSONALLY KILL THE BASTARD MYSELF. ALL CREATION OCCURS

BETWEEN AND AS OPPOSITES. YOU DUMB-ASS, EARTH, THE UNIVERSE

AND EVERY LIVING THING IN IT

He's not even making an argument or support his view. He is also using ad hominems. So why the fuck do you think he has anything valid to say? (Besides that you're just a troll, craving for attention, lurking to find stuff to attack, and never, ever, really contribute anything valuable?)

[Goathead]

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

I got A+ in honors English classes in college, up to the highest level. But that doesn't matter because when I debate here, I'm playing around.

Oh, I see. So you're saying you *have* all the qualifications of a skilled debater but you're just... "playing around" here, so we shouldn't expect to see any of these said talents from you. All right. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I apologize as I thought you were being serious.

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

Especially when I'm debating with a troll like you. I have not problem calling what I see even if it offends you.

I actually *do* find this somewhat offensive, however I'll let it slide. Obviously you've been tackled into a logical corner and are using ad hominem attacks and crying "troll" in an attempt to force your own pathetic insecurities on honest members of the debate.

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

I'm actually using the skills, knowledge, and training I got in multiple classes involving research and study of source materials.

Well with a response like this:

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

And a crazy man's words are relevant how?

Perhaps you could learn from taking a class in biological anthropology?

I can't help but say "Yes Ouroboros you were right all along. You clearly seem like someone who got A+ grades throughout their English classes and knows how to maturely and rationally address the subject at hand." (In case you're too caught up in playing around to notice: this is sarcasm.)

[Ouroboros]

Goathead, on 29 July 2010 - 08:16 PM, said:

Oh, I see. So you're saying you *have* all the qualifications of a skilled debater but you're just... "playing around" here, so we shouldn't expect to see any of these said talents from you. All right. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I apologize as I thought you were being serious.

You trolls. You're too funny.

Quote

I actually *do* find this somewhat offensive, however I'll let it slide. Obviously you've been tackled into a logical corner and are using ad hominem attacks and crying "troll" in an attempt to force your own pathetic insecurities on honest members of the debate.

Pfft. You're not attempting any honest debate at all. So far, you have portrayed a perfect troll. Nothing you've done have convinced me that you're serious.

Btw, are you Ray?

Quote

]
I can't help but say "Yes Ouroboros you were right all along. You clearly seem like someone who got A+ grades throughout their English classes and knows how to maturely and rationally address the subject at hand." (In case you're too caught up in playing around to notice: this is sarcasm.)

You haven't provided anything serious or scientific so far, so why should I take you serious?

So reveal your identity. Are you Gene Ray, the Cube Lunatic? Or are you just a regular troll?


You know, the first step is denial. We have revealed that you are a troll, and you must of course deny it. Good for you. 10 points for trollish authenticity.

[Goathead]

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

I got A+ in honors English classes in college, up to the highest level. But that doesn't matter because when I debate here, I'm playing around.

Oh, I see. So you're saying you *have* all the qualifications of a skilled debater but you're just... "playing around" here, so we shouldn't expect to see any of these said talents from you. All right. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I apologize as I thought you were being serious.

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

Especially when I'm debating with a troll like you. I have not problem calling what I see even if it offends you.

I actually *do* find this somewhat offensive, however I'll let it slide. Obviously you've been tackled into a logical corner and are using ad hominem attacks and crying "troll" in an attempt to force your own pathetic insecurities on honest members of the debate.

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

I'm actually using the skills, knowledge, and training I got in multiple classes involving research and study of source materials.

Well with a response like this:

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

And a crazy man's words are relevant how?

Perhaps you could learn from taking a class in biological anthropology?

I can't help but say "Yes Ouroboros you were right all along. You clearly seem like someone who got A+ grades throughout their English classes and knows how to maturely and rationally address the subject at hand." (In case you're too caught up in playing around to notice: this is sarcasm.)

[Ouroboros]

Posting the same response twice somehow makes it better?

[Checkmate]

Goathead, on 29 July 2010 - 07:37 PM, said:

Ouroboros, on 29 July 2010 - 10:21 AM, said:

And a crazy man's words are relevant how?

Perhaps you could learn from taking a class in biological anthropology?

So all you can do is throw insults instead of address the point? .......

A-hem! Speaking of addressing the point...

Why is it that every time I return to check the status of MY thread I find that it's been hi-jacked by some troll spouting nonsense?!?

Once again: THIS thread is for Christians to show us a MIRACLE, thus providing evidence that what they say about god/Jesus is true. And failing that, simply shut the fuck up and go away. Don't throw childish temper tantrums and stamp your little feet, accusing the big, bad atheists of being liars and deceivers who won't believe "even if the dead were to rise from the grave", yadda, yadda, yadda.

Put up, or shut up.

Not a difficult concept to follow, people.