Vigile Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Your Inner Fish: 3 part mini-series. How did your body become the complicated, quirky, amazing machine it is today? Anatomist Neil Shubin uncovers the answers in this new look at human evolution. Using fossils, embryos and genes, he reveals how our bodies are the legacy of ancient fish, reptiles and primates — the ancestors you never knew were in your family tree. http://www.primewire.ag/watch-2745687-Your-Inner-Fish (Gorillavid loads quickest/easiest for me) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thought2Much Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Does Ray Comfort's response to any kind of science rise above the level of "Nuh-uh!" anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vigile Posted April 18, 2014 Author Share Posted April 18, 2014 Probably not, but there's some slam dunks in this that I thought members might enjoy. I've only seen the first ep, but if you watch it through, they provide pretty irrefutable evidence for evolution that I think even the most stubborn would have difficulty denying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thought2Much Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Snarkiness about Ray Comfort aside, I have been meaning to watch this. I'll see if I can find time in the next couple of weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blood Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Probably not, but there's some slam dunks in this that I thought members might enjoy. I've only seen the first ep, but if you watch it through, they provide pretty irrefutable evidence for evolution that I think even the most stubborn would have difficulty denying. Well, that was true 100 years ago. It didn't stop them then, so it won't stop them now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RipVanWinkle Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 I thought W's face always looked kind of like a fish. Now I know why. bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 You asked for it! http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2014/04/12/review-inner-fish-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted April 19, 2014 Super Moderator Share Posted April 19, 2014 Does Ray Comfort's response to any kind of science rise above the level of "Nuh-uh!" anyway? He does occasionally throw in a little "neener neener NEENER" along with his "Nuh-uh" argument. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillLooking Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 You asked for it! http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2014/04/12/review-inner-fish-1 The reason why she refuted the article can be summed up in this sentence: "But what about those pesky hernias? God designed a perfect human body along with a perfect world in the beginning. How do we know? He told us so in Genesis 1:31." When an author already has a hard answer then backtrack her way to find supports for her answer then it is not science anymore. On a side note, she is an MD not a PhD in any biological science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 You asked for it! http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2014/04/12/review-inner-fish-1 The reason why she refuted the article can be summed up in this sentence: "But what about those pesky hernias? God designed a perfect human body along with a perfect world in the beginning. How do we know? He told us so in Genesis 1:31." When an author already has a hard answer then backtrack her way to find supports for her answer then it is not science anymore. On a side note, she is an MD not a PhD in any biological science. Not only that but she left the medical field to be a stay-at-home mom NINETEEN YEARS AGO. When that's the best expert you can find to support your case, you've got problems. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/e_mitchell.asp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StillLooking Posted April 20, 2014 Share Posted April 20, 2014 You asked for it! http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2014/04/12/review-inner-fish-1 The reason why she refuted the article can be summed up in this sentence: "But what about those pesky hernias? God designed a perfect human body along with a perfect world in the beginning. How do we know? He told us so in Genesis 1:31." When an author already has a hard answer then backtrack her way to find supports for her answer then it is not science anymore. On a side note, she is an MD not a PhD in any biological science. Not only that but she left the medical field to be a stay-at-home mom NINETEEN YEARS AGO. When that's the best expert you can find to support your case, you've got problems. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/e_mitchell.asp Wow, you are right. My prediction is she probably hasn't been keeping with the new development and discoveries in science for the past view years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vigile Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share Posted April 20, 2014 'Left the medical field' -- christianese for 'was a phlebotomist who got pregnant and became a stay-at-home mom'. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts