1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Sooo if want to eat dinner you must first decode this message **************************************************************************A1 Arguwar aata Rgwt vwkuwd ub Fis a1s 1or rgwew ua 1i Fid, ri acis rgw REAO id naju1f a oiaurucw xkaun, twr rgwt wbs yo dakku1f u1ri rgar aane reao rgwt reuwd ri acis vt aatu1f rgu1fa kujw rgwew us 1o au1 1o gwkk 1o adrwekudw. Rgwt qibr aat rgwew ua 1i Fid vyr rgwt gacw 1o oeivkwn aatubf rgwew ua 1o aub 1o g1o 1o adrwekudw. Xi1reasuxrui1 Arwaj qurg A1 AAyxw akk icwe ur!*************************************************************************** So time to blow you away with the biggest Hearty meal you ever witnessed in your natural born life! you ready for this big juicy steaK? tell me you ready! you want it? you like it? ooh, oooh aaaaahhh, yeaa...you like that? Ahem....wait what are we talking about here? got off track. ok so on to my topic. Why is it that *SOME* Athiest will advocate with their mouth wide open at the highest mountain in the world and say that That there is No Sin? There is no Afterlife? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orbit Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 A1 Sauce, oh A1 Sauce...because we reject the Bible, which is the source for these ideas. Thread over. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share Posted December 11, 2014 Ha definitely not over.....I will reveal why later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pratt Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Sooo if want to eat dinner you must first decode this k so on to my topic. Why is it that *SOME* Athiest will advocate with their mouth wide open at the highest mountain in the world and say that That there is No Sin? There is no Afterlife? because there are "SOME" asshole christians shafting their christian dicks into people's throat? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mymistake Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Why is it that *SOME* Athiest will advocate with their mouth wide open at the highest mountain in the world and say that That there is No Sin? There is no Afterlife? Because there is no legitimate reason to believe there is any sin or any afterlife. If there are no gods then it is impossible to offend someone who doesn't exist. All the evidence indicates that a human stops existing at death. All the evidence indicates that gods are fictional characters created by humans. Glad to help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fweethawt Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Why is it that *SOME* Athiest will advocate with their mouth wide open at the highest mountain in the world and say that That there is No Sin? There is no Afterlife? No atheist would "advocate" anything "with their mouth wide open at the highest mountain". An atheist would be smart enough to know that nobody would hear him all the way up there. Sorry, but we just don't make'em that stupid. We leave that to the theists... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mydisplayname Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 <snip> So time to blow you away with the biggest Hearty meal you ever witnessed in your natural born life! you ready for this big juicy steaK? tell me you ready! you want it? you like it? ooh, oooh aaaaahhh, yeaa...you like that? <snip> I want no part of whatever the fuck you're talking about. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share Posted December 11, 2014 so to reveal the dinner special in my First post, i used coded letters on my keyboard, upon cracking the code this is what it says. Sooo if want to eat dinner you must first decode this message Why will not Say there is no God but they have no problem saying there is no sin no hell no afterlife no supernatural? How can you say that positive claim without evidence???! BOP is on me and ANYONE who makes a positive claim. Contradiction Steak for sale! with A1 Sauce for only $4.99! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 please don't shout a1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orbit Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Strong atheism makes the claim there is no God. I am a weak atheist, who says there is not enough evidence to believe there is a God (not the same as saying there isn't one). So there is no contradiction, just evidence that you don't have a good understanding of what atheism is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share Posted December 11, 2014 correct if you dont make positive claim you are in the nuetral position and nuetral position doesnt require evidence right? neither does faith require evidence right? so you are taking the nuetral position on faith right? because nuetral position doenst require evidence and according to athiest faith doesnt either so you are doing the exact definition of faith accorsding to athiests Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pratt Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 oh fuck logic n spelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator TrueFreedom Posted December 11, 2014 Moderator Share Posted December 11, 2014 A1, Are you trying to say that we can't say that there are absolutely no absolutes? By the way, though I won't claim objective knowledge of anything, I find it highly unlikely that a god who intervenes in human affairs exists or that human consciousness and memories survive the death of the brain and body. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator TrueFreedom Posted December 11, 2014 Moderator Share Posted December 11, 2014 Oh, you're accusing us of living by faith. Yes, we presuppose that our senses are reliable and that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orbit Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 correct if you dont make positive claim you are in the nuetral position and nuetral position doesnt require evidence right? neither does faith require evidence right? so you are taking the nuetral position on faith right? because nuetral position doenst require evidence and according to athiest faith doesnt either so you are doing the exact definition of faith accorsding to athiests My position is based on the lack of evidence for God, which is not the same thing as faith; in fact it is the opposite of faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey101 Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Or you could just not give a shit if there's a Gaaaawwwd. Kind of like how you Christians don't give a shit if there's a Allah or a Mohammed. It's not your religion so you don't even think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thackerie Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 correct if you dont make positive claim you are in the nuetral position and nuetral position doesnt require evidence right? neither does faith require evidence right? so you are taking the nuetral position on faith right? because nuetral position doenst require evidence and according to athiest faith doesnt either so you are doing the exact definition of faith accorsding to athiests Why are you still writing in code? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator buffettphan Posted December 11, 2014 Super Moderator Share Posted December 11, 2014 correct if you dont make positive claim you are in the nuetral position and nuetral position doesnt require evidence right? neither does faith require evidence right? so you are taking the nuetral position on faith right? because nuetral position doenst require evidence and according to athiest faith doesnt either so you are doing the exact definition of faith accorsding to athiests Why are you still writing in code? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share Posted December 11, 2014 is athiesm true or false?Athiestthats non sensical it is neither true or false so you hold a position that isnt trueso you take it on faith if it is NOT...then what is it? AthiestI dont need evidence for my athiesm position Faith(according to athiests)holding a position with no evidene Soo by your own definition you are holding athiesm in faith unles you change the definition of faith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey101 Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 is athiesm true or false? Athiest thats non sensical it is neither true or false so you hold a position that isnt true so you take it on faith if it is NOT...then what is it? Athiest I dont need evidence for my athiesm position Faith(according to athiests) holding a position with no evidene Soo by your own definition you are holding athiesm in faith unles you change the definition of faith Why don't you believe in Hinduism? People believe things according to where they live. Here is the US, there are lots of different beliefs, the main one being Christianity. It's no surprise that you're a Christian. Also, there a many atheists here, so it's no surprise either. But since you're a dick, you don't like people believing differently than you do and feel the need to convert them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share Posted December 11, 2014 you dont need evidence to NOT believe something right? Is your definition of Faith is have a position without evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey101 Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Faith has nothing to do with evidence, that's why it's called faith. Science is about evidence, it is not about faith. Plenty of scientists have religious faith, but they realize the difference between faith and science. They don't try to scientifically prove their faith because it's like trying to scientifically prove art. Faith is conceptual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1AcceptingAThiest1 Posted December 11, 2014 Author Share Posted December 11, 2014 Faith has nothing to do with evidence, that's why it's called faith. Not believing in something also does not require evidence right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey101 Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 Faith has nothing to do with evidence, that's why it's called faith. Not believing in something also does not require evidence right? Believing or not believing something doesn't require evidence, but it can have evidence. Religious belief is usually categorized as faith, because it's not about having evidence. Belief that the earth revolves around the sun is not categorized as faith, because it has evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ crazyguy123 ◊ Posted December 11, 2014 Share Posted December 11, 2014 ok so on to my topic. Why is it that *SOME* Athiest will advocate with their mouth wide open at the highest mountain in the world and say that That there is No Sin? There is no Afterlife? The reason is because no one that believes in a concept of sin or an afterlife has demonstrated that these things exist. They have only asserted that they do and in some cases, demanded that we just accept their assertions as fact based on faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts