bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Now, End, if you want to talk about secular humanism, which is an atheist wod view, that is a set of particular beliefs in which the people who fall under this system can be liberal or extreme, just like everything else. Secular Humanists believe in quite a lot, actually. Skepticism is another atheist world view, and they believe in practically nothing LOL. Party pooping skeptics. Buddhism is an atheist religion, and probably the only religion in the world I don't have a problem with. Are you starting to see, End? I might get your point, but I would think we would have to delve into what constitutes belief...which I care NOT to do...but again, per your example a religion would be more of a collective set of beliefs after the fundamental aspect has been considered. Maybe you see MY point...lol. And fwiw....look at this damn site. You have supermods (elders), mods (deacons), members, tithing, and praising of the FSM. Need I say more. Nope. No need to say any more, End. What you said fitted the criteria of this thread's title perfectly! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sylensikeelyoo Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Now, End, if you want to talk about secular humanism, which is an atheist wod view, that is a set of particular beliefs in which the people who fall under this system can be liberal or extreme, just like everything else. Secular Humanists believe in quite a lot, actually. Skepticism is another atheist world view, and they believe in practically nothing LOL. Party pooping skeptics. Buddhism is an atheist religion, and probably the only religion in the world I don't have a problem with. Are you starting to see, End? I might get your point, but I would think we would have to delve into what constitutes belief...which I care NOT to do...but again, per your example a religion would be more of a collective set of beliefs after the fundamental aspect has been considered. Maybe you see MY point...lol. And fwiw....look at this damn site. You have supermods (elders), mods (deacons), members, tithing, and praising of the FSM. Need I say more. Nope. No need to say any more, End. What you said fitted the criteria of this thread's title perfectly! ROFLMAO! YES! YES IT DOES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Hey. Hey End, now you're stepping on my toes here. Fuck off my Spaghetti Monster. Perhaps your lack of belief in his noodliness is testament to your true religion: "Nonbelievers in Spaghetti Monsterism" HA! CHECKMATE AGAIN ATHEISTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sylensikeelyoo Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 CHEESE BE UPON HIM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 To make my point again, if I were to convert to Pastaism, then I would be in a fundamental stage of the belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sylensikeelyoo Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 What about antipastaism? That a belief too? Not beleiving in pasta is a belief? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sylensikeelyoo Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons". *leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mymistake Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 To make my point again, if I were to convert to Pastaism, then I would be in a fundamental stage of the belief. You so funny, End! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Here you go, End. What happens when you try to equate non-belief with belief. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/divide-by-zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons". *leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen. Why not just say I don't believe without any reasons? Not sure belief is a "static" position. In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. Would already have quit arguing this point had it not been for your excellent sense of humor. So I'm out sylenskipoo unless you have something earthshattering. When you post crap like this does the FSM have a headcovering rule? Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sylensikeelyoo Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons".*leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen.Why not just say I don't believe without any reasons? Not sure belief is a "static" position. In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. Would already have quit arguing this point had it not been for your excellent sense of humor. So I'm out sylenskipoo unless you have something earthshattering. When you post crap like this does the FSM have a headcovering rule? Lol. Oh I'll shatter your world alright End. *winks* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sylensikeelyoo Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 I guarantee I can out troll you on my own thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qadeshet Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "That's just the Old Testament." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons".*leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen. Why not just say I don't believe without any reasons? Not sure belief is a "static" position. In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. Would already have quit arguing this point had it not been for your excellent sense of humor. So I'm out sylenskipoo unless you have something earthshattering. When you post crap like this does the FSM have a headcovering rule? Lol. Oh I'll shatter your world alright End. *winks* Be still my heart... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 I guarantee I can out troll you on my own thread. Lol, give me a few moments to think S.....now that you have thrown the glove down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mymistake Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. End there are an infinite number of things you don't believe in. There is no reason for most of them. Thus unbelief isn't fundamentalism. Why don't you believe in Esdfwser? Why don't you believe in Ulkjsdf? Why don't you believe in Tsdf Vsfrew? Why don't you believe in Wsd? There are an infinite number of beliefs you don't believe. Unbelief is the normal, default response. It takes a cause to create belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons". *leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen. Why not just say I don't believe without any reasons? Not sure belief is a "static" position. In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. Would already have quit arguing this point had it not been for your excellent sense of humor. So I'm out sylenskipoo unless you have something earthshattering. When you post crap like this does the FSM have a headcovering rule? Lol. Non-belief (nothing) is a belief (something)...? So nothing is something? . . . Oy vey! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons". *leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen. Why not just say I don't believe without any reasons? Not sure belief is a "static" position. In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. Would already have quit arguing this point had it not been for your excellent sense of humor. So I'm out sylenskipoo unless you have something earthshattering. When you post crap like this does the FSM have a headcovering rule? Lol. Non-belief (nothing) is a belief (something)...? So nothing is something? . . . Oy vey! Yes. Convince me non-belief is not an active response. I'm open to listening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mymistake Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Yes. Convince me non-belief is not an active response. I'm open to listening. It has been explained several times now yet you are unconvinced. What would it take to convince you . . . quoting a Bible verse that states unbelief is the default? Because there is no Bible verse that states this. All we have is reality. So what will it take for you to change your mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 "I believe there is no FSM for these fundamental reasons". *leg humps* SHHHHHHHH END! just....just let it happen. Why not just say I don't believe without any reasons? Not sure belief is a "static" position. In other words, and IMO, non-belief is based on some set of propositions as is belief....a foundation, i.e. the fundamentals....aka fundamentalism. Would already have quit arguing this point had it not been for your excellent sense of humor. So I'm out sylenskipoo unless you have something earthshattering. When you post crap like this does the FSM have a headcovering rule? Lol. Non-belief (nothing) is a belief (something)...? So nothing is something? . . . Oy vey! Yes. Convince me non-belief is not an active response. I'm open to listening. Ok then. What is the 9-letter word that is the main reason why we are unbelievers? (Hint: It start and finishes with the letter, 'E') Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 'nuther hint: You're confusing what's in the process with the end result. -2 added to +2 = 0. The process is active, but the result is a big, fat ZERO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest end3 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 'nuther hint: You're confusing what's in the process with the end result. -2 added to +2 = 0. The process is active, but the result is a big, fat ZERO! Excellent example....it takes fundamental effort to see +2 and also see -2. One can then move on to a more moderate (in most cases), 0. You notice that nature is working toward an equilibrium as well as the moderators here, and deacons, and elders, to present people with a developed response rather than the initial plus two or minus two position. This does NOT negate a fundamental response yielding + or - two. Btw, the point Christ was making is it takes sacrifice for us to move to an equilibrium, but that we do it out of love. Elementary stuff, yet gospel per the twisted OP....lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 'nuther hint: You're confusing what's in the process with the end result. -2 added to +2 = 0. The process is active, but the result is a big, fat ZERO! Excellent example....it takes fundamental effort to see +2 and also see -2. One can then move on to a more moderate (in most cases), 0. You notice that nature is working toward an equilibrium as well as the moderators here, and deacons, and elders, to present people with a developed response rather than the initial plus two or minus two position. This does NOT negate a fundamental response yielding + or - two. Btw, the point Christ was making is it takes sacrifice for us to move to an equilibrium, but that we do it out of love. Elementary stuff, yet gospel per the twisted OP....lol. And what is the result of the effort, End? Something or nothing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornagainathiest Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Where are we unbelievers, End? Still in the process, or arrived at the (zero) result? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts