Fweethawt Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Judging by the look on this woman's face, she is proud to teach you this lesson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythra Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Oh my. I wander war shees frum? An' I thot sciince war a methed, nod a theery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdelsolray Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Strawman fallacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythra Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 i thenk it wer de theery of sciince thet shewed da fack of ebolushun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythra Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 Comedian Bill Engvall: HERE'S YOUR SIGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythra Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 You know, normally I wouldn't make fun of stupid people. Except when they think they're smarter than the smart people, and they put it on display. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midniterider Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Intelligent Design? Oh , she must mean how the Flying Spaghetti Monster created everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythra Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 What are you, one of them thar pastafarians? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
violetbutterfly Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantheory Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Guess she forgot to check her dictionary before she wrote her "nice" little note. Science is not a theory, but a method as mentioned by Mythra above. The method is not fool-proof, granted since it must always look for errors in its work and logic. All proposed explanations should be testable and repeatable to help confirm their possible validity. Science can produce hypothesis, often competing, to give reason to explain observations. Once observations and/or experiments are continuously repeated in various ways attempting to eliminate error, for a long-enough period of time under the scrutiny of a great many other scientists, a hypothesis could then be written that might gain endorsements over time and eventually could be considered a theory by some or many. Neither intelligent design, creationism, the spiritual world, any bible, or any gods, are testable or confirmable as to their validity. They are all religious beliefs. Anything that has not been/ cannot be proven to exist cannot be taught in public schools as a subject other than their characteristic as culturally quaint stories: abominable snowman (Yeti), Santa Clause, Chupacabra (central American legend). Also taught in historical context such as the rise of the Abrahamic Religions over the millennia, Changes in Christian cultures over the ages, etc. But everyone posting here knows of these things anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts