bornagainathiest Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/fine-tuning/ I reckon this would be of interest to Disillusioned, Blamtasticful, sdelsolray, RogueScholar, JoshPantera and Ficino. Thanks, BAA. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantheory Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 Yeah, the cosmos fine tuned for life is generally a religions argument in that, according to the Abrahamic religions, God created the cosmos and other life generally for man's sake. I do know of theorists who have discussed fine-tuning, but, I myself consider fine-tuning a bogus argument with no meaning to it concerning science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantheory Posted September 5, 2017 Share Posted September 5, 2017 IMO The problem with the fine tuning argument that we see coming from scientists, is that many scientists believe that the conditions of the universe could have been different. On the other hand, according to related theory that I promote, all of the possible variables in the universe, forces, energies, matter, etc. all are dependent on each other. If this is true then our singular universe could only exist in one condition, the one that we observe. No other possibilities would exist and the fine tuning arguments, whether coming from religion, philosophy, or science, as the one discussed in the link above, would accordingly all be bogus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now