Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Amy Marie Vs. Bruce


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Bruce

Bruce

    Logical Meanie

  • ☆ Silver Patron ☆
  • 553 posts
  • Location:Austin, TX
  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what? :Pirate

Posted 06 June 2006 - 06:11 PM

Amy Marie has agreed to take an affirmative position regarding the resurrection of Jesus. Bruce will take the counter.

Amy Marie must now provide her debate proposition and opening argument.

Moderator: Nivek (if he accepts)

Basic ground rules are given:

FORMAT

Round One:
Proponent opens - 1500 word limit
Opponent refutes - 1500 word limit

Round Two:
Proponent refutes above - 1000 word limit
Opponent refutes above - 1000 word limit

Round Three:
Proponent cross-examines - 3 questions only.
Opponent answers - 250 words each question.

Round Four:
Opponent cross-examines - 3 questions only.
Proponent answers - 250 words each question.

Round Five:
Proponent concludes - 500 word limit
Opponent concludes - 500 word limit

Membership Q&A
Member questions - 3 questions to each participant. 1 question only per member. A total of 6 questions asked.



GUIDELINES


Word Count - The best way to make sure your word count is within the given limits is to use an application such as Microsoft Word. Paste your document into Word and click on 'properties' under the dropdown menu 'File'. There is a tab that gives statistics. One of those statistics is a word count. The moderator will not count greetings and other such comments at the beginning and end of the post in the word count.

Proposal - Give your proposal an accurate short title descriptive of the thesis you will propose. Clearly state the background of your argument, be specific. (Catholic, reformed protestant, atheist, mormon, etc…) RESEARCH your topic beforehand and present a complete argument that is clear and well thought out. Define any terms our members or your opponent may not be clear on. Your Proposal may not exceed 1500 words.

Counter Proposal - The opponents may present one counter proposal specific to the proponent problem area. By this, we mean that the counterproposal must deal with the arguments presented by the proponent. State what the background of your counter argument is. Research your topic. Counter proposals should include a reasonable alternative. Define terms. Counter Proposal may not exceed 1500 words.

Rebuttal - Used to respond to the opposition’s lines of argument made in the proposal and counter proposal, and to extend arguments, clarify or introduce new evidence related to previous arguments. (New arguments in rebuttal are left to the discretion of the participants, but the participant should only advance new arguments if they have successfully addressed their opponent's arguments. The participant will risk their position if they fail to address their opponent and opt to "change the subject." In other words, new arguments are introduced at the debater’s own risk.) Rebuttals may not exceed 1000 words.

Cross Examination – Each participant will have an opportunity to ask the opposition 3 questions in cross-examination. Questions should be brief and specific and constructed as to not require an answer to exceed a couple paragraphs. Answers must deal directly with the questions. Answers may not exceed 250 words per question.

Conclusions - Demonstrate how you have established or refuted the thesis. Conclusions may not exceed 500 words.

Membership Q&A - Questions must be approved by the moderator/judge prior to them being answered. Post your questions after conclusions are complete. The Moderator will delete questions not chosen and mark selected questions to be answered as approved.
3 questions to each participant for a total of 6 questions will be approved.

**THERE WILL BE A 3 DAY LIMIT (MAX) BETWEEN RESPONSES**.



RULES

Evidence- ONLY use evidence that is accurate and thoroughly referenced in your presentation. Evidence will be accurately and directly quoted. (ALL EVIDENCE MUST BE FROM A PUBLISHED SOURCE, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, AND VERIFIABLE.) The first time a source is presented, the debater must state the full source when introducing the evidence. A “full source” is assumed to include author’s name, author’s qualifications (when apparent in the original), full date, and title of source with page numbers. Once a source has been cited, evidence subsequently cited from the source need only include the author and/or publication name as well as a phrase along the lines of “previously cited.”

Conduct - Absolutely no personal attacks or ‘flames’. Please address your criticisms to arguments, not to people. If you violate this rule, your post will be deleted, and at the discretion of the moderator, you may be removed from the debate forum.

Important: Remember, debates are constructed for the benefit of the membership/listener, not your opponent. In other words, address your arguments to the audience! (Eg: "Mr. Smith has not shown how 'A' is true, because...)


  • 0

#2 nivek

nivek

    Serial Animal Killer

  • Super Moderator
  • 13,695 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NE OrYgunn, uSA
  • Interests:Old Iron, Old Booze, Old Guns, Dogs, Women and Lots of Money in no particular given order.
  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what? :Whatever happens, panned out

Posted 06 June 2006 - 10:54 PM

Looking forward to an interesting opening and discussion back and forth between Amy and Bruce.

Will remind readers that this section is reserved for the participants in the debate, all other comments will be dropped into the "Peanut Gallery" for this section.

All posts save for Amy and Bruce will be terminated from this section without mercy, warnings given to offenders. Repeat offenders removed from Boards until debate time has run.

At the end of Debate I'll open a public poll in which the viewers may cast their opinion(s) on the results.

Thanks to all for participation. Enjoy.

kL

320142_10150340296443664_341592968663_8042737_1959594305_n.jpg

Posted Image

Since the State necessarily lives by the compulsory confiscation of private capital, and since its expansion necessarily involves ever-greater incursions on private individuals and private enterprise, we must assert that the state is profoundly and inherently anti-capitalist. --Murray N Rothbard. Anatomy of the State


Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. - Frédéric Bastiat


#3 Bruce

Bruce

    Logical Meanie

  • ☆ Silver Patron ☆
  • 553 posts
  • Location:Austin, TX
  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what? :Pirate

Posted 07 June 2006 - 03:42 AM

Bruce,

You have to understand that I am somewhat computer illiterate. I'm a terribly slow typest. I am one of those people who types with two fingers. When I read all your rules at the arena I knew then that I had gotten myself in over my head. It would just take me hours and hours to do all the research, cite my sources etc. I should have read your rules and thought about it more before I told you I would challenge you. I admit that in no way would I be a worthy opponent. You need someone more on your intellectual level. I certainly have my arguments supporting the Resurrection of Christ but presenting them in such a skilled articulate manner as you would, well, I'll stick to my paint brushes and canvas and leave the debating to the more scholarly folks on the forum. I feel like a high school student entering an advanced college debate.

So I wish to decline and sorry for your trouble.

Amy

Gee! And to think that all those lions were so eager chomping at the bit ready to taste blood. But I'm sure there will be halariously joyful when they find out I declined.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users