Jump to content

TheRedneckProfessor

Moderator
  • Content Count

    6,742
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    190

TheRedneckProfessor last won the day on October 12

TheRedneckProfessor had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5,058 Damn!

2 Followers

About TheRedneckProfessor

  • Rank
    General Moderator
  • Birthday June 22

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Out There Where the Foxes Fuck
  • Interests
    Biotechnology, Immunology, Genetics, History, Atheism, Anything Southern.
  • More About Me
    cogito ergo sum

Previous Fields

  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what?
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

6,928 profile views
  1. If you're worried about how much time this is taking, I'd recommend not dodging questions as often as you have been.
  2. 7 Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. 8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. 9 In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. 10 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. 11 Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another. 1 John 4 Assuming this is one of those places where the bible is complete, and can thus be used as evidence, does the bible say that god is love? And from this scripture and many others like it, does christian doctrine teach that god is all-loving? As an honest answer, "I don't know" generally works; as a dodge, not so much.
  3. @Edgarcito, I'm still waiting for your answer to the question: Is god all-loving? Thanks.
  4. The bible is incomplete; it even says so in the bible. Thus the bible is unreliable as evidence.
  5. I'm still not sure you're understanding the point I'm trying to make here; but, I can assure you that I agree with this paragraph entirely.
  6. Fixed that for you. This is the problem with non-interference in free will, irrespective of which deity is involved. Non-interference invariably favors the evil. The free will of Hitler versus that of 6.5 million Jews, the free will of a mass murderer versus that of the victims, the free will of a con artist versus that of a mark. Evil invariably prevails. god is not exculpated simply because he doesn't interfere. If anything, he is further inculpated.
  7. So the "free will" of the ten-year-old sex slave? Is it exercised? Or is it violated?
  8. Since you broached the subject though, does non-interference in free will favor the evil or the innocent? What does our present reality demonstrate?
  9. Remember----I specifically said I am working toward demonstrating whether edgarcito's original premise has merit. I don't really care about the existence of deity in general; but, rather, the specific deity in question.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.