Justus

☆ Silver Patron ☆
  • Content Count

    456
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

8 Neutral

About Justus

  • Rank
    Strong Minded

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Canst say for sure, dam things keeps moving, but at least it keeps coming back to the same spot or I would be totally lost.
  • Interests
    Phasmalogy TM
  • More About Me
    How much does a scientist make per theory? Here's one on the scientific mystery regarding which came first, the chicken or the egg? My theory is the Cock, a doddle dew.... so to speak. TM

Previous Fields

  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what?
    the Holy Ghost

Recent Profile Visitors

508 profile views
  1. Justus

    Hand of God

    I guess you have to have your house being taking away by those whose house got taken away to see the irony What like a bush? LOL, I got it. good one. The fire will spark the funds within a day to two to cover the cost of its renovation that by the rapid spread of the flames indicated a much needed renovation. I find it strange that the French President would even suggest that France would assist in the rebuilding of a Catholic Church much less vow, but the times they be decaying.
  2. So do you think your opinion is inerrant? Ipso Facto So you think opinions are plain horrible when it comes to truth and reality? Just asking...
  3. So how many believe the Notre Dame fire was an act of God?
  4. Oh my bad I thought this thread was about the Texas residence homestead exemption.
  5. 8 Bar-tailed Godwit – 20000 feet. 7 Mallard – 21000 feet. 6 Bearded Vulture – 24000 feet. 5 Alpine Chough – 26500 feet. 4 Whooper Swan – 27000 feet. 3 Bar-headed Goose – 29000 feet. 2 Common Crane – 33000 feet. 1 Ruppell's Griffon Vulture – 37000 feet Source If it's Wikipedia it might be true... The absence of oxygen doesn't seem to effect this dude. (Peak of Mt. Everest 29,000+ feet) But your right in the sense that thinner air density makes replenishing one's oxygen extremely more difficult.
  6. Common give it up. The scriptures say that the LORD (Spirit of truth) would raise from a Prophet ( Man:male or female) from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. Any idea what the words (________) will be?
  7. No, there was only y chromosome Adam, mitochondrial Eve and our most recent common ancestor.
  8. While I don't know whether or not his mother professed to be a Christian, but I guess as the mother of God she could profess to be whoever she wanted to be.. Yet initially the term Christian only referred unto those who Jesus had chosen to serve in his ministry. Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?John 6:70 And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch. Acts 11:26 However, as the Emperor of the Roman Empire, Augustus held the title of Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus which Divi Filius translates as Son of God.
  9. Of course, that doesn't mean that living matter couldn't have evolved out of non-living matter but it does mean that the odds that it did are the same that Jesus could have spontaneously became living matter out of non-living matter after his death. While it would seem impossible to say that one could be true and the other false, I have 0% doubt it is.
  10. Whatever book of Jasher you want to use, "so the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day." The sun stands in the same spot in the center of the solar system every day or for at least 23 hours and 56 minutes..
  11. If you have to ask then you don't know then. I can't since that would require you to first know what you were doing. Depends upon what your case is.
  12. If you won't even answer your own question first then please don't pester me with your unsolicited questions.
  13. Let me start by saying that I don't consider that you are illiterate for misspelling the word abiogenesis, but rather indicates that you probably didn't copy and paste what you posted which is way better than someone who can't comprehend what is written. While you have every right to believe that Catholic doctrine of evolution is real science but that doesn't make it any less a Catholic doctrine. However, the fact that the doctrine of evolution originated from the interpretation of scripture and not from the observation of nature which is apparent by the simple application of the scientific method. If it isn't apparent to you then why would even make a difference if it was. Of course the doctrine of evolution has no relation to the Big Bang theory, which isn't a Catholic doctrine based upon the interpretation of Biblical scripture published in a scientific form. But it is interesting that if you work for the Pope you get to retain the Intellectual Property Rights, which is kinda ironic considering that vow of poverty clause, but at least the Priest is credited with his creation and was able to continue teaching at the Catholic University of Science where they teach the two great lights are the sun and the moon, and evolution too. How bizzare. So in conclusion I have no interested in arguing the subjective beliefs of the objective believers who are offended by the fact I breath. Not saying your one of them, but if you don't want to hear something that doesn't affirm your divinity then hopefully I haven't offended you and if I did oh well.
  14. So are you a Catholic since you are promoting the Catholic doctrine for the origin of the species. Well let's see, as an Ex-Christian you must have admitted as a Christian that you were a sinner right? So do you believe you were sinner or were you lying? From a state in the USA? Wow, you ought to read "A Man without a Country." The US is a state of the United Nations pursuant to the treaty ratified by the US Senate shortly after WWII. Ever hear the song Won't get fooled again? UNITED NATIONS DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Article 30. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. I guess you didn't get the invite.
  15. So if it a trial you want, then it will be a trial you get. So Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, the Prosecutor (that's you sdelsolray ) accuses me of being a troll and cites thread after thread [See sdelsoray Indictment attached below] where he claims I trolled on this forum, as if in the scheme of things this has any relevance to what is relevant in life but I have anything going at this morning, or at least until the sun comes up at which point it will be drone time, so I thought I would humor him with a response written in the light . So other members and lurkers, let me begin by begin by warning you of the Prosecutor who present the data they want without disclosing all the data in order to obtain the verdict he desires. By offering as evidence as a couple of pieces of data, this Prosecutor covers the data he doesn't want to see by placing with the tons of posts which he knows you are not going to sort and sift through which inside is just as effective as if he didn't disclose it all since either way you won't examine it. Only this way he appears innocent of any deception, which is transgression he has committed with his false allegations against the one they call Justus. And in such, face which this cunningly crafted allegation which would take more time than it would be worth to respond to, the accused will suggest that for brevity's sake that we simply use this thread in making a determination of whether the accused is a troll or not since a troll would troll and if therefore was the intent of the accused to troll then not knowing he was going to be accused of trolling then it the guilt or innocence should evident within this thread since it would be the impartial data indicative of the motivations of the one accused would they not? I know you are right when you say they would, and the reason I know you are right is because the do! So being agreed lets examine the accused first post in this thread. I posted this comment in hopes that anyone who read it would catch the 'stumbled' reference the OP had made by referring to the 24 hour day which anyone familiar with the scriptures could associate with the passage in which Jesus said are there not 12 hours in day. Thus, if any man walks in the day he stumbles not because he sees the friggin convergence of light which becomes the divergent bands of EMS from this center point of our physical world. And if any man walks in the night he stumbles because there is no light in him. So I was simply showing those members or lurkers who were reading the thread was to connect the dots between the comment made by the OP referring to stumbling and the stumbling reference passage regarding 12 hours in a day. So in my own way I was telling the OP not to get carried away with his inferences regarding the light within this forum. I'll put it like this, I listen to the instruction of men wiser than me so if you care to tell me the meaning of the term 'rend' then I will show you it what it means when you don't know that you don't even know me. So if anyone wants to know why I don't respond to the questions asked by some members then I would aver to the advice of my counsel, see Matthew 7:6. So in conclusion, judge me all you want its drone time for me. P.S.