Jump to content


Authentic Christian Believer
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Justus

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Canst say for sure, dam things keeps moving, but at least it keeps coming back to the same spot or I would be totally lost.
  • Interests
    Phasmalogy TM
  • More About Me
    How much does a scientist make per theory? Here's one on the scientific mystery regarding which came first, the chicken or the egg? My theory is the Cock, a doddle dew.... so to speak. TM

Previous Fields

  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what?
    the Holy Ghost

Recent Profile Visitors

873 profile views

Justus's Achievements


Proficient (10/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges



  1. Some might say that it is because they don't need to look over their shoulder to see what they are after.
  2. So you got you one of them there talking Bibles, kewl; so do you think it is true what some people say about the talking Bible, that it is smarter than any beast of the field which Nature's God had made? I guess it is if it told ya'll the answer is yes.
  3. And you must be that second coat of paint that George talked about to cover the misery and hate.
  4. Do you speak from experience or because you heard somebody say it and believe it?
  5. “It is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving;it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.” Thomas Paine
  6. Then why do you say that the religious view that draws a distinction between man and primates is very dangerous. I know it is systemic so you don't realize it, but your argument is the same one they used to assign human values to Caucasian* race while denying the same human value to those of the Negro race. So what biological fact do you use to assign the same human value to Ota Benga below, to the Caucasian and not the primate in the picture on the video below (Ota Benga is the one holding the primate in his arm) since we are all 99% genetically equal. There must be some basis you use to distinguish between human and primates and if not then are you saying one can discern the rights of those who they consider equal based upon their appearance? Note *(I am aware of the fact that the term Caucasian has been redefined to refer only to certain group of white people)
  7. Of course, I presume your fundamental reality is that animals are equal to man and should be entitled to the same rights? No? then you believe that animals can discriminate against other animals? You comment strangely sounds like the thoughts of Jeffrey Dahmer, but racist.
  8. If not mistaken that is the Big Bang theory that states that all space, matter, energy and time has always existed and magically blew into existence from an highly condensed state known as a primordial atom to form the known and observed eternal universe. You can say potato and they can say potatoe, but no matter which way you say it, you are both referring unto the same ole tuber. And that tuber is nothing but a spud.
  9. That's why Jesus rebuked the rich young ruler that called him Good Master by simply asking the Roman "why do you call me good, there is none good but Caesar."
  10. There is no 'infinite' monster except in the heads of theoretical philosophers who know a finite object which is expanding is still a finite object whether it expands or not.
  11. Why would anyone use the data from a European patent search if the patent number is for a US patent? Just curious.... As far as I know, the only live virus from the coronavirus family of viruses that can be patented is one has been attenuated. If not mistaken a live attenuated cornavirus is a virus used for vaccines. But at least you made the effort to make inquiry, but the only reason viruses are created that aren't attenuated is for use as a biological weapon, so no nobody files a patent for creating a disease. I am not saying that the Convid-19 is a made man or anything of the sorts.
  12. Yet they never apologize for claiming that all mankind on earth originated from one woman, do they?
  13. Of course, a patent for a Coronavirus virus might suggest that shit doesn't just happen. Do the vaccines for these viruses just happen? Of course there is patent for a Coronavirus, it is a US patent # 10130701 and here is the link to the USPO to verify it. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=10130701.PN.&OS=PN/10130701&RS=PN/10130701 Do you know why they patent vaccines for infectious diseases?
  14. Of course everyone hears of an idea from somebody who had the idea originally. I don't know how far this website archives the post of members, yet I referenced the '120 years' being the days of man in posts on this website in 2015 and well before that on others. But that wouldn't prove anything because if posts can be added then then would be any reason to believe it validated anything. As I stated that I haven't heard one claim asserting that the LORD had set the days of man in the flesh at a 120 years and neither of those websites state that man's lifespan in the flesh upon earth was set at 120 years. If you had read on the neverthristy.org webpage you cited, they made the conclusion that the 120 years referenced in Genesis 6:3 referred to that time that the global flood would occur. LOL, please. If the interpretation, or hypothesis if you will, is that man does not live in the flesh over 120 years, then a falsiability of the hypothesis would be that if a person lives over 120 years then that "hypothesis' is untrue. And if data presents itself which shows the falsiability of the hypothesis, then it wouldn't make a difference to you whether it was true or not because you don't believe the hypothesis. But then again, it wouldn't make any difference to you would it Since people usually talk about what they consider to be true rather than what they don't consider true, at least productive people anyways, maybe you brought it up because you believe that death could be programmed into the human genome to occur at a given point of time if all other causation for death had failed, oh heck what am I saying. But who were you being sarcastic too?
  15. So the deity told you that when men began to multiply upon the face of the earth that everybody would be killed in a 120 years? Well shoot man, I wouldn't believe that deity either.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.