Jump to content

Justus

Authentic Christian Believer
  • Content Count

    625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Justus

  1. Some might say that it is because they don't need to look over their shoulder to see what they are after.
  2. So you got you one of them there talking Bibles, kewl; so do you think it is true what some people say about the talking Bible, that it is smarter than any beast of the field which Nature's God had made? I guess it is if it told ya'll the answer is yes.
  3. And you must be that second coat of paint that George talked about to cover the misery and hate.
  4. Do you speak from experience or because you heard somebody say it and believe it?
  5. “It is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving;it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.” Thomas Paine
  6. Well, if you believed the LORD murdered almost everyone in a great flood after he placed his bow in the cloud then you probably believe that a rainbow is the result of light refraction then too. In which case brings me to the Thomas Paine quote that trying to reason with someone who forsaken reason itself is like giving medicine to a dead person. But FYI, a rainbow isn't produced by light refraction, light refraction simply directs the electromagnetic wave in a different direction which produces the visible multi-colored band depending on one's viewing position relative to the a
  7. Well, there are two heavens described inIn Genesis 1. In Genesis 1:1 you have the heaven being the expanse of space which forms the physical world we call the universe. That is where all the celestial bodies, or planets. exist within. Just for curiosity sake, how do you classified space, is it nothing or is it something? If it is something then what do you think it is? It can't be matter if all matter has mass since two object of mass can't can occupy the same area at the same time. Then in Genesis 1:8 you have the firmament which separates the celest
  8. Then why do you say that the religious view that draws a distinction between man and primates is very dangerous. I know it is systemic so you don't realize it, but your argument is the same one they used to assign human values to Caucasian* race while denying the same human value to those of the Negro race. So what biological fact do you use to assign the same human value to Ota Benga below, to the Caucasian and not the primate in the picture on the video below (Ota Benga is the one holding the primate in his arm) since we are all 99% genetically equal. There
  9. Unless you subscribe to the OT laws on childbirth then what difference does it make who the parents of a child are in respect to the legitimacy of that child as an individual? Moreover, if you believe the LORD is the father of Jesus then what difference would the genealogy of Joseph have on that belief? Just asking....
  10. Of course, I presume your fundamental reality is that animals are equal to man and should be entitled to the same rights? No? then you believe that animals can discriminate against other animals? You comment strangely sounds like the thoughts of Jeffrey Dahmer, but racist.
  11. If you read Genesis 1:20 then it would be obvious why the term 'firmament' is associated with the atmosphere. Oh okay, as long as you say so.... He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. Job 26:7 So why does NASA claim on it's website that "a cloud is made of water drops or ice crystals floating in the sky."?
  12. If not mistaken that is the Big Bang theory that states that all space, matter, energy and time has always existed and magically blew into existence from an highly condensed state known as a primordial atom to form the known and observed eternal universe. You can say potato and they can say potatoe, but no matter which way you say it, you are both referring unto the same ole tuber. And that tuber is nothing but a spud.
  13. That's why Jesus rebuked the rich young ruler that called him Good Master by simply asking the Roman "why do you call me good, there is none good but Caesar."
  14. There is no 'infinite' monster except in the heads of theoretical philosophers who know a finite object which is expanding is still a finite object whether it expands or not.
  15. Why would anyone use the data from a European patent search if the patent number is for a US patent? Just curious.... As far as I know, the only live virus from the coronavirus family of viruses that can be patented is one has been attenuated. If not mistaken a live attenuated cornavirus is a virus used for vaccines. But at least you made the effort to make inquiry, but the only reason viruses are created that aren't attenuated is for use as a biological weapon, so no nobody files a patent for creating a disease. I am not saying that the Convid-19 is a made man or a
  16. Yet they never apologize for claiming that all mankind on earth originated from one woman, do they?
  17. Of course, a patent for a Coronavirus virus might suggest that shit doesn't just happen. Do the vaccines for these viruses just happen? Of course there is patent for a Coronavirus, it is a US patent # 10130701 and here is the link to the USPO to verify it. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=10130701.PN.&OS=PN/10130701&RS=PN/10130701 Do you know why they patent vaccines for infectious diseases?
  18. Of course everyone hears of an idea from somebody who had the idea originally. I don't know how far this website archives the post of members, yet I referenced the '120 years' being the days of man in posts on this website in 2015 and well before that on others. But that wouldn't prove anything because if posts can be added then then would be any reason to believe it validated anything. As I stated that I haven't heard one claim asserting that the LORD had set the days of man in the flesh at a 120 years and neither of those websi
  19. So the deity told you that when men began to multiply upon the face of the earth that everybody would be killed in a 120 years? Well shoot man, I wouldn't believe that deity either.
  20. Well, to begin with you are using a copyrighted Bible which means you one of those eternal mortals right? The last evolved translation of the ancient writings from their original language into the English language is found in the KJV translation where one would find that it is written in Genesis 6:3 ; "And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years." I would be interested in hearing where you heard it said that the maximum life span on humans is 120 years?
  21. What did you want a relationship with? the Church or God?
  22. Nope, that is why he tells the married male and female to ask Him at home. 34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. 35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. 1 Cor 14:34-35
  23. Humm, if the Spirit of truth wasn't a real entity, I guess I would rebel against him with words without knowledge.
  24. That is correct, in Genesis 1:1, the substance which formed the expanse of space in the beginning was created by Elohim, or the gods. The term 'gods' may very well have a different meaning than what is cited by man made doctrines, but then again believers can't believe all things. But I am sure you are aware, the Biblical term 'create' infers the act in which something is brought into existence that has never existed, in either nature or substance, prior to the time it is created. Whereas evolve infers the process by which an existent substance develops or is made into a new or d
  25. If you claim Truthseeker is a she then I believe you when you say you know she is, that is why I used the 'he' in the syntax of gender neutral because 'man' can be either a male or female. Yet ironically you never had a clue that child born unto a virgin would be a female or do you not believe that parthenogenesis is possible in humans and that a child born from a zygote formed without cell fusion between the gametes of a male and female are only known to produce an xx offspring in humans?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.