Jump to content

TEG

Regular Member
  • Content Count

    238
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

TEG last won the day on March 5 2020

TEG had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

311 Excellent

About TEG

  • Rank
    Strong Minded

Profile Information

  • Location
    USA
  • Interests
    Photography, coding, ancient philosophy, fretted instruments, Spotify.
  • More About Me
    Ex-fundamentalist, raised in the christian churches/churches of christ.

Previous Fields

  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what?
    Nope.

Recent Profile Visitors

406 profile views
  1. Like I said, this is not my understanding of agnosticism. I’m done.
  2. I define agnosticism differently. The “if you do not claim certainty, you are an agnostic” definition is new to me. An agnostic is someone who maintains that we do not, or cannot, have enough knowledge to decide the issue of god’s existence. It refers to the limitations of what knowledge can do, not the quantity of knowledge that we have. I believe that a rational person, looking at the failed arguments for god, and not seeing any evidence for a divine presence or divine intervention, would conclude that there is no god. I have. I do not claim absolute knowledge or certainty but I have e
  3. Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. 1 John 4:1-3
  4. How about, “Rosabelle, believe?” Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It would have to be something pretty specific, that I could personally verify. As florduh said, it doesn’t seem to have happened yet.
  5. I don’t understand this part. I am saying that I see no evidence for the assertion that consciousness is eternal. A spirit arising from a dead body and speaking, or a disembodied hand writing on a wall.
  6. I propose abandoning the word “gnostic” in this context because the concept has turned into something completely misleading which asserts something that most atheists do not assert. To say that one is an atheist does not imply absolute certainty or any special form of knowledge apart from normal human reasoning. When I say that I do not believe that there is an ancient race of humans living beneath the surface of Mars, I am not claiming certainty, I just have no reason to believe it and it is therefore not part of my belief system. And, most importantly, I am willing to go ahead and say tha
  7. The assertion was made that consciousness is eternal. I am going to defer the question of how we know anything because that is an entirely different subject. I do not perceive any evidence of consciousness apart from a brain, such as a spirit arising from a dead body and speaking, or a disembodied hand writing on a wall. You can turn someone’s consciousness off by whacking them on the head, or giving them drugs. When someone descends into dementia due to a disease like Alzheimer’s, it is often painfully evident that they are not the person they once were, not recognizing their family membe
  8. I would like to come up with next year’s grass, on a nice hillside somewhere. Getting back to the thread, I do not see any evidence that consciousness is eternal. It is matter-dependent, brain-dependent, is altered when the brain is altered, and ends when the brain dies.
  9. I agree that intuition can sometimes cut through a difficult conundrum, as if your unconscious mind knows something that your conscious one doesn’t. But as part of a reasoned argument, an appeal to intuition is still a logical fallacy. And I would not build my whole life on it.
  10. So if someone insists that you believe in the spaghetti monster because they feel it inside, and you say you don’t because there is no evidence, do you see an equivalence between those two sides of the argument?
  11. The gnostic gospels (and acts, and apocalypses etc.) are a mishmash of writings by all kinds of people; they do not present a unified message. In the gospel of Mary, she was loved more than the other disciples and knew things they did not, and they had to acknowledge it. Just fwiw . . . .
  12. The knee-jerk weasely answer is that the kingdom is the church, the new testament era that was established after Jesus rose from the dead. But christians pay surprisingly little attention to what Jesus really meant by the son of man, the earthly messiah in Daniel 7 who comes with the clouds of heaven, probably because he never came: I was watching in the night visions, And behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came to the Ancient of Days, And they brought Him near before Him. Then to Him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, Tha
  13. Thank you for your support; it means a lot to me. What if the Koran is true after all? What if the Bhagavad Gita is true after all? What Odin or Zeus was true after all? Step back and look at planet earth. What in the world would make a person believe in that hideous bible? At some point the blinders will fall off and you will see things differently.
  14. If they go to church, put money in the plate, try to do right, and dutifully tell people that they believe, I would give them the benefit of the doubt. If they really did not believe, they would not do all that stuff. There is even room for doubt; “Lord, I believe; help my unbelief.” Another agnostic theist is the uneducated person who says, “don’t confuse me with all that theology stuff; I believe, and that’s that.” I would say there is a significant number of those folks (I have known a few), even if some of them are not being honest.
  15. It almost sounds like you want to hold onto christianity in some way. There are other christianities besides the orthodox one that was established by the Roman empire. The gnostics believed that the creator was a flawed, inferior being, jealous and vengeful, and that is why the world, and most of the old testament, are so messed up. People are little sparks of divine stuff trapped in matter, and we do not belong here. Jesus was the incarnate Logos, one of the aeons who emanate from the One, the ultimate being of the universe, and came to earth to break the spell that traps us here and show
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.