Jump to content


Regular Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About faithevoloved

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Virginia Beach
  • Interests
    God/source, music (metal and rock), playing guitar, singing, spirituality, philosophy
  • More About Me
    I'm an ex-(fundamental)-Christian, but still believe in God.

Previous Fields

  • Still have any Gods? If so, who or what?
    The Universal Father

Recent Profile Visitors

68 profile views
  1. The difference between the celestial teapot and sight is that seeing is part of the shared "illusion" or "hallucination" (as some would call it) of humanity. i'm sure 99.9% of humanity has never witnessed the celestial teapot.
  2. Sure, I get what you are saying. But the blind person would not have experiential proof of seeing if he cannot see himself. Sure, you can describe it the best you can scientifically or doing experiments but yet still the blind man cannot see.
  3. I think I will always believe in a higher power, just because it seems silly to rule it out. Heck, we are not even a type 1 civilization on the Kardashev scale. We know so little about the universe compared to what we will someday know. Maybe what some might call supernatural are beings from other realms that we simply just haven't met yet...
  4. First of all, I will say that as of recently, I have decided that I am no longer going to attend a bible-based fundamental church ever again. I am just so done hearing the same story over and over again that I'm a sinner and that God had to send is perfect son to die for our sins so we could be saved from a place of eternal conscious torment. This is hard for me, because I grew up in the church, got baptized, went to youth group, young adults group, healing services, retreats/camps, even did a Christian internet radio show for years. I remember defending the old testament's description of God
  5. Good point. Define God? That's tough but let's assume God is to mean the entity responsible for our existence... e.g "creator"...this assumes absolutely nothing about his/it's character besides the fact we were created by him/it. I think that would be a barebones definition. As far as proof of his existence, there is ZERO direct proof. This is because he/it is outside his creation...we are in a closed-system, if you will. However, indirectly, there is proof everywhere...e.g. the complex human body, cells, DNA code, etc.
  6. Wow, thanks for all the replies. I appreciate the points of view and the candid yet respectful manner in how you all answered me. It seems to come down to lack of evidence in God that makes someone come to the conclusion there is no God. Ok, yes...I'm captain obvious. Here's my best evidence: Recently, I discovered a guy named Tommy who is blind from birth who has a YouTube channel called "The Tommy Edison Experience". Check out this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJC56zsfl0M After watching that, I thought to myself...how in the world cou
  7. Sure, I get wanting to throw your hands up and give up religion. I'm one of those guys who begged for years to be healed of my mental health issues and speak in tongues, or otherwise have a major conversion experience, but that never happened. However, I just don't understand why people completely give up on God because they've had bad experiences in the church. Why is the only option atheism when you don't get what you want from God? Why can't the options be: 1) Atheism 2) Maybe Christians are wrong/have only part of the truth...so I'll make it my life mission to figure this
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.