MrSpooky Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 http://www.livejournal.com/users/theferrett/519211.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♦ nivek ♦ Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Ummmmm.. OhhhKayyyyyy... IF humans and dinos co-existed, why are no bones found of each species on the same dig? Religionist Flooders kinda foget that humans and those big assed critters supposedly were on planet at supposedly same time... You'd probably find some *evidence* buried in the layers of this where critters of all sorts were mixed and layered down upon as the silt from this cataclysm settled.. I'll not hold my breath, nor give up the single malt waiting for a crackpo, err, creationist to explain this one away... n Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurisaz Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Ummmmm.. OhhhKayyyyyy... IF humans and dinos co-existed, why are no bones found of each species on the same dig? *activates cretinist simulator* PALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXY! Glory to gawd! *turns it off again* Just as I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JP1283 Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 That was pretty funny. The whole "man lived with dinosaurs" thing is really ridiculous. I can't believe people believe that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Neil Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 I fell out of my chair laughing at the attacking dinosaurs. Waaaaay too funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sokudo Ningyou Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Oh come on. Obviously men and dinosaurs shared the planet at the same time. "The Flintstones" are solid proof of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Neil Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 I can just picture Hovind claiming to find Fred's caveman sedan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sokudo Ningyou Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Complete with Dino and Pebbles' "accidents" in the back seat. Fossilized feces; a rock-solid (pun intended) bit o' proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandora Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 Oh my, are they being sarcastic? Maybe this is someone's really well done trick to throw us all off. LOL Birds often die in that pose, and dinosaurs are related to birds. It is in fact called the "death pose" in pet birds and often has to be explain that it doesn't indicate any final struggle or pain. And, if this isn't the case, then when other animals die, they die flaccid in the water after having passed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valgeir Posted June 3, 2005 Share Posted June 3, 2005 ...Shoot me. Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Posted June 4, 2005 Share Posted June 4, 2005 A verifiable scientific fact? On what planet??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quicksand Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 Aww, I saw just the comics part - this is awesome! Amazing. Awesome. i love it i love it. I want a copy. Wow. Amazing. And I am not bullshitting. There is something very cool about this no matter how goofy it is. ____ Wow, you can buy it! Sweet. You know... I don't know. There is just something so cool about this. And of course, the word cool I might as well subsitute with the word godly, but damn, I dont know. I appreciate it. (Puts down wine glass...) ____ Also, this guys blog seems pretty godly cool too. Bookmark. Okay never mind me. I just bought "Visitation" with Peter Davidson, so that's my big date tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hannibal Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 I like how the writer underlines all the big points - it seems like he's trying to convince himself that it's all true.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 Oh come on. Obviously men and dinosaurs shared the planet at the same time. "The Flintstones" are solid proof of that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And don't forget Alley Oop! He rode a dino..Dinny the dino to be exact. I sat on Dinny too..somewhere I have a pic..see! Proof! Dinos still exist, and I rode one! Here it is..proof that humans and dinos co-existed: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest marktaylor Posted June 11, 2005 Share Posted June 11, 2005 All I can say is, I'm glad I read these posts first. I'll think I'm gonna stay here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nirrti Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Oh no! You mean the angels killed Barney the dinosaur too? But he was so cute.....and purple! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 And don't forget Alley Oop! He rode a dino..Dinny the dino to be exact. I sat on Dinny too..somewhere I have a pic..see! Proof! Dinos still exist, and I rode one! Here it is..proof that humans and dinos co-existed: So which one is the human, and which one is the dinosaur? [edit] Dad - Stop there Boy, what did you bring with you? Boy - It followed me home. D - It's a friggin Dino! Junior. Take it ouside. B - But dad, it likes me, it want to stay with me. D - No we can't have a dinosaur in our house, take it out B - Daad. It so cute. [twinkle his eyes] [Dino eat dads pizza] D - NO! No Dinosaurs! [dino eats remote control] D - Look it already ate my remote control, and my pizza! Get out! B - Pretty please [noise gets louder, dino rumbling around in house] D - NOOO! It pooped on the floor! Take it out NOW! [dino turns around] D - Dino! get ouaaaargh. ... [dino eats dad] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 So which one is the human, and which one is the dinosaur? I'm not sure how to take that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 I'm not sure how to take that... I was just kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 I was just kidding. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ok.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted June 12, 2005 Share Posted June 12, 2005 Ok.. I like to tease people sometimes, so don't take it personal or something. The comment was not indented to be disrespectful or demeaning. We're cool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard Posted June 13, 2005 Share Posted June 13, 2005 I like to tease people sometimes, so don't take it personal or something.The comment was not indented to be disrespectful or demeaning. We're cool? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, we're cool..no offense taken where none was intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spamandham Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 *activates cretinist simulator* PALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXYPALUXY! Glory to gawd! *turns it off again* Just as I thought. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ok, living in the Dallas area, I felt compelled to actually go see these tracks for myself (it's only about a 1.5 hour drive). I've explored dinosaur valley several times, including paying some old farmer to park on his land and explore tracks most people don't see. Give me a friggin break. There are NO human prints there, and it's obvious to anyone who has actually seen the tracks first hand. The 'alleged' human tracks exist only in photoshopped versions of the prints, where human feet have been superimposed over dino imprints that have a few vague similarities - sort of like seeing faces in the clouds. But, the stride is way too big even for the size of the photoshopped feet. The tracks that are claimed to be "giant man tracks" are obviously dino tracks. They don't even have the right shape or position of toes to be human. It's just rediculous. I even paid the 3 bucks to visit the ultra-lame Creation Evidences Museum. I can't even describe to you how absurdly rediculous it is. It's a small mobil home type building with a few chairs, a projector, and a couple of pictures and casts of fossils (plus a front desk with crap for sale). The casts and the accompanying pictures are the closest thing they have to any actual evidence, but considering these have been prohibted from independent examination, well, draw your own conclusion. They have a cast of a "human print" within a dino print. Nothing like it exists down in the river bed, leading me to believe it's a fraud. They also have a picture of a hammer imbedded within the stone. That "might" actually be legit. It looks like a hammer from the 1800's, and it could be. A 100+ year old hammer dropped into the cracks during earlier exploration of the tracks could have leached into the soft limestone in that amount of time. It never ceases to amaze me how gullible people are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 This has to be a joke... noooo they can't really be serious!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard Posted June 24, 2005 Share Posted June 24, 2005 Ok, living in the Dallas area, I felt compelled to actually go see these tracks for myself (it's only about a 1.5 hour drive). I've explored dinosaur valley several times, including paying some old farmer to park on his land and explore tracks most people don't see. Give me a friggin break. There are NO human prints there, and it's obvious to anyone who has actually seen the tracks first hand. The 'alleged' human tracks exist only in photoshopped versions of the prints, where human feet have been superimposed over dino imprints that have a few vague similarities - sort of like seeing faces in the clouds. But, the stride is way too big even for the size of the photoshopped feet. The tracks that are claimed to be "giant man tracks" are obviously dino tracks. They don't even have the right shape or position of toes to be human. It's just rediculous. I even paid the 3 bucks to visit the ultra-lame Creation Evidences Museum. I can't even describe to you how absurdly rediculous it is. It's a small mobil home type building with a few chairs, a projector, and a couple of pictures and casts of fossils (plus a front desk with crap for sale). The casts and the accompanying pictures are the closest thing they have to any actual evidence, but considering these have been prohibted from independent examination, well, draw your own conclusion. They have a cast of a "human print" within a dino print. Nothing like it exists down in the river bed, leading me to believe it's a fraud. They also have a picture of a hammer imbedded within the stone. That "might" actually be legit. It looks like a hammer from the 1800's, and it could be. A 100+ year old hammer dropped into the cracks during earlier exploration of the tracks could have leached into the soft limestone in that amount of time. It never ceases to amaze me how gullible people are. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They've upgraded..its a large TV and another smaller one with I assume a VCR..I didn't see the hammer in the stone.. We watched the video, coming in on day three of creation, I believe..something about time dilation, so that we only sensed 6 days passing while the rest of the universe was experiencing billions of years? Did you see the Pirhana? They are an experiment, I forget what he said they did, but they are bigger than their peers..I took pics..I'll try and post a few after I resize..the fish were cool..lol.. They are building a new museum next to it, in a real building, depending on donations..oh, and we only paid $2 a piece..guess they were having a sale? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts