Jump to content

Call For 'post-9/11' Religious Ed Teaching In Uk

Grandpa Harley

Recommended Posts



Call for 'post-9/11' RE teaching

By Robert Pigott

BBC Religious Affairs correspondent


RE teachers must provide children with a more sophisticated understanding of the subject in a post-11 September world, Ofsted says.


After a five-year inspection of RE classes which began in the year of the attacks on the US, Ofsted says rote learning of RE is no longer adequate.


It says teachers should include ways in which religion is not always a force for good.


Increasingly pupils have been opting to study RE for GCSE and A-level exams.


Ofsted says that in England, which it covers, RE is being taught better.


'Standard responses'


In many schools, religion is linked with contemporary religious and moral issues, such as whether the war in Iraq was morally justified.


But all too often, say the inspectors, the exam system encourages "standard, mechanistic responses" running the risk of "trivialising significant religious issues".


It says students are often denied the profound understanding they need of the impact of religion on society.


This has raised people's awareness of religion and raised the importance of considering religion's role in society

Miriam Rosen, Ofsted


"Religion is much more in the media than it has been in recent years" says Ofsted's Director of Education, Miriam Rosen, "and this is, of course, because of events like the bombings in London in July 2005 and the New York incident back in 2001.


"This has raised people's awareness of religion and raised the importance of considering religion's role in society, and the impact of it."


One of the most radical suggestions in Ofsted's report is that religion should be taught warts and all. The inspectors called on teachers not to shy away from controversy, but to accept in their classes that religion could be a force for bad as well as for good.


"Pupils should be taught that religion is complex," says the report, "and should be given the opportunity to explore that ambiguity."


'Solve issues themselves'


Angus Dawson, RE teacher at Royal Manor Arts College in Portland, has long found that pupils enjoy the ambiguity of religion, enjoying the "struggle between ideas" where there are often no right answers.


"We embrace the idea that religious ideas lead to conflict," said Mr Dawson. "The skills we teach (pupils) allow them to unpack the ambiguity and tension between ideas in a clear and straightforward way and to solve the issues for themselves."


But that level of achievement is too rare says Ofsted.


Miriam Rosen said: "They're not really concentrating on teaching about the role of religion in society and its contribution towards community cohesion. The very best are, but this is not consistently done."


Schools minister Andrew Adonis said RE can help educate children about issues surrounding community, diversity and tolerance.


He said: "Religious education is an important academic subject in its own right but it can also make a positive contribution to pupils' broad personal development and well-being, as well as bringing in issues of community cohesion, diversity, tolerance and respect.


"We agree that the potential of RE to contribute to children's education and understanding in these areas should be fully realised."


RE has long suffered a lack of specialist teachers, but Ofsted focuses on weakness in how progress is assessed, and the way the curriculum is planned, for the inadequacies in the subject.


It says that lessons often fail to build on prior learning. There is no national curriculum in RE.


Instead, all 151 local authorities are responsible for developing their own locally agreed syllabus. Ofsted says that hinders attempts to raise standards in RE, and consistency, across the country.


And those improvements are overdue. Ofsted says only a quarter of schools - albeit on its fairly small sample - were recorded as producing "good" achievement or better in pupils. One in eight were failing to produce even "adequate" achievement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a positive development, provided they do not present the distortion that religion itself is responsible for evil, but rather a person's interpretation of it. I think it's best to present it as a tool that can be used a variety of ways, but incapable of working by itself.


Albeit I am forced to admit that, for example, Islam and Scientology espouse hateful doctrines; however, the ultimate culmination of those doctrines in action is still the responsibility of the people who commit them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back when I were a nipper, wi' rickets and ringworm, the RE I had focussed on history of the Gospels. Three synoptics, John, and Acts... confirmed to me it was all bollocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.