Eccles Posted August 26, 2007 Share Posted August 26, 2007 If you are asked the question: "Do you believe in God" by a Christian" and you answer "No", that makes the assumption that there is a "God". My response is: "As there is no God, "no" would be the wrong answer as it could make the assumption that there is a God". I might say: "What God"? But I probably would also say: "As there is no God how can I answer No. I do not believe in God" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mankey Posted August 26, 2007 Share Posted August 26, 2007 If you are asked the question: "Do you believe in God" by a Christian" and you answer "No", that makes the assumption that there is a "God". My response is: "As there is no God, "no" would be the wrong answer as it could make the assumption that there is a God". I might say: "What God"? But I probably would also say: "As there is no God how an I answer No, I do not believe in God" The stolen concept fallacy is committed by superstitionists any time they try to explain supernatural. God is supernatural to most theists. They steal from naturalism every time they try to explain God. The existence of Matter/energy is universal, where as supernatural is not.....there fore....they can not say that we are assuming God. The law of identity applies only to what is universally self evident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts