♦ nivek ♦ Posted October 19, 2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 George W. Bush is not a douche bag!from Reason to Freedom by Michelle L "When used for its intended purpose, a douche bag is a useful item -- one that renders previously contaminated areas clean and fresh. I seriously doubt even the most ardent supporter would be able to say any area that has come into contact with Bush and his administration is cleaner or in better condition than before. I think calling him a douche bag does a grave disservice to an otherwise humble yet effective device." (10/18/07) http://www.reasontofreedom.com/george_w_bu...douche_bag.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbobrob Posted October 19, 2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 Opie and Anthony can not say the phrase "douche bag" without the company censor hitting the dump button. Douche is OK, but don't add Bag. Not an FCC rule (yet) mind you, but the radio stations are scared about what the FCC will suddenly deem improper, since they never give a warning when the rules change. Bush may not be a douche bag, but he has done a great job cleaning media of all their free speech rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueGiant Posted October 19, 2007 Share Posted October 19, 2007 I'd have to agree that calling GWB a douche bag is a disservice to douche bags everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShackledNoMore Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Sometimes you have to admit that you were wrong, and I see I was wrong about thinking Bush was a douche bag. I will no longer denigrate the noble douche bag in this manner. I hope to still be able to call him a scum bag, but I fear I may yet find that scum bags don't deserve an insult like this, either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
white_raven23 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I hope to still be able to call him a scum bag, but I fear I may yet find that scum bags don't deserve an insult like this, either. Indeed! If the scum is nicely stored in a bag, then that's scum that is no longer residing under the toilet rim, cluttering up the surfaces of otherwise clean ponds, or filming up my shower doors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShackledNoMore Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I hope to still be able to call him a scum bag, but I fear I may yet find that scum bags don't deserve an insult like this, either. Indeed! If the scum is nicely stored in a bag, then that's scum that is no longer residing under the toilet rim, cluttering up the surfaces of otherwise clean ponds, or filming up my shower doors. That's what we need--a Bush bag. It only has to last until Jan 20, 2009. Of course it will need to hold Cheney too, or it won't do any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedPillAddict Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 So...I can still call him a dumb-fuck, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luck Mermaid Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 No!!!! You see, how many people have great sex with gorgeous dumb people? Just because someone is dumb and good in bed does not mean they should be denigrated!!! Besides, I suspect that aside from being dumb, George Bush is not too good in bed, either. Actually, I think Douche Bag would be appropriate. While there may be some uses for various types of hyegenic douches - (insert Bush joke here) - the common massengil garden-variety drugstore douche was a marketing plan thought up to make a quick buck off of women who were told their vaginas were dirty and diseased - in fact, douches can be harmful to vaginas, especially with prolonged use since they upset the vaginas natural and delicate ecological balance. Bush is heading up a party that is trying to reverse womens access to abortion and birth control services, as well as cutting health care and general social program funding, which will disproportionately affect women, and our vaginas. Therefore - douches (generally speaking) are bad for vaginas. Bush is also bad for bushes. And the bags of douche themselves are usually made out of plastic - a substance I hardly need to point out uses fossil fuels, leaches toxic chemicals and damages our global home for tens of thousands of years before fully biodegrading. Id say douche-bag is about accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 I don't think I've ever called him that. Idiot and moron suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldjew Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I prefer just plain Creosote Bush as creosote bushes are sticky, stinky and when they burn make lots of smoke just like GWB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ephesos Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Hmmmm... I consider Georgieboy Wanker B. a COCNON - a Compound Of Cells No One Needs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts