Jeff H Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Since when has R.S. Martin sweared once in this thread? I believe this can be shown by arbitrarily turning the word "and" into a swear word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. S. Martin Posted September 21, 2008 Author Share Posted September 21, 2008 Neon Genesis, You've asked alot of questions that simply don't make sense (those questions simply CANNOT be answered) Whoa! Hold on there! QUESTIONS AN OMNISCIENT GOD CAN'T ANSWER!??!?!? Now that's a new one. I guess God lied when he said he can't lie. He says in the bible that: he can't lie he knows everything that is to be known he made everything that is and that without him nothing was made that exists this includes our brains along with all the questions we (Neon Genesis and I) ask his thoughts are so much higher than our thoughts as the heavens are higher than the earth We know that answers exist for all questions that humans can possibly ask. If this weren't the case, then God's thoughts would not be higher than human thoughts. I am human and I am quite sure Neon Genesis is human. God's got to either be much higher and so his thoughts must be exceedingly much higher, too, or he lied in the Bible and the Bible is a Lie. For been there done that to say the questions don't make sense and can't be answered--that's just plain stupid, irrational, and unscriptural. because they're based on rationalizations and ridiculously false assumptions that no reasonable person would actually think is true. Disproved with one stroke. If your intention is to simply cause extreme confusion and simply OPPOSE anything and everything, the most peaceful and reasonable thing I can do is ignore these questions. You speak out of your own unconscious. Nothing describes your own behaviour better that this statement. If you would like to explain how this question makes sense (and actually MAKE SENSE in your reply without convoluted rationalizations and scenarios), then I will believe that you are serious. Um, so you admit that you yourself are not serious? Thanks for your honesty. Oh? You don't like me throwing this back on you? Sorry, but I see things the way they are. Better not say things that aren't true if you don't like me seeing right through your tricks. Where did God get this "pass" that you claim He has? This was one of the questions you asked... "Why does god get a special pass to commit whatever action he wants...?" Yes. Where did he? If you are God's special rep you should be able to answer that question. If God--or you as his rep--won't answer questions about God's credentials, he comes under direct suspicion. And so do you. That's just normal security procedures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. S. Martin Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 okay, i see that you attempted to explain your weird way of redefining words. however, all the capital letters, the liberal use of parentheses, and atrocious amount of apostrophes made wading through your explanation about as pleasant as receiving a root canal. Excellent post, Munk. Now how about using capitals where they belong, since you're on the topic of the proper usage of the English language. It would add the finishing touch to your otherwise really good post. As it stands, in my opinion, your lack of caps undermines your message. Not to mention the difficulty in reading it. I have other reading problems to do with vision, etc. and I can't be the only one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munk Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 okay, i see that you attempted to explain your weird way of redefining words. however, all the capital letters, the liberal use of parentheses, and atrocious amount of apostrophes made wading through your explanation about as pleasant as receiving a root canal. Excellent post, Munk. Now how about using capitals where they belong, since you're on the topic of the proper usage of the English language. It would add the finishing touch to your otherwise really good post. As it stands, in my opinion, your lack of caps undermines your message. Not to mention the difficulty in reading it. I have other reading problems to do with vision, etc. and I can't be the only one. You're very right. I've gotten too complacent with "net speak". I really should start typing like an adult Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. S. Martin Posted September 23, 2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2008 okay, i see that you attempted to explain your weird way of redefining words. however, all the capital letters, the liberal use of parentheses, and atrocious amount of apostrophes made wading through your explanation about as pleasant as receiving a root canal. Excellent post, Munk. Now how about using capitals where they belong, since you're on the topic of the proper usage of the English language. It would add the finishing touch to your otherwise really good post. As it stands, in my opinion, your lack of caps undermines your message. Not to mention the difficulty in reading it. I have other reading problems to do with vision, etc. and I can't be the only one. You're very right. I've gotten too complacent with "net speak". I really should start typing like an adult Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts