Observant Noahide Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 The concept of xtianity is so stupid it really makes one wonder how we could have been so fooled - and the concept of the trinity is equally bizzare - considering it is pagan to the core. However I have often wondered if one confronted xtians on what did happen to jc's foreksin considering you believe he is god and what happend to his holy poo? If he was god it would still be around! Perish the thought!! Not finished yet ... holy semen .. which impregnated mary as the xtians believe - think about it folks GODS SEMEN IMPREGNATING MARY ...yes it does stretch the imagination does it not? And taking it to a full conclusion kind of blows ones mind! And of course it is another pagan belief!! My didn't we do well!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Not finished yet ... holy semen .. which impregnated mary as the xtians believe - think about it folks GODS SEMEN IMPREGNATING MARY ...yes it does stretch the imagination does it not? And taking it to a full conclusion kind of blows ones mind! Agree. It's a weird thing to think that God somehow created a gamete, with a haploid DNA and even complete with non-coding nucleotides. It would be just as easy for God to just create a full grown Jesus, like he supposedly did with Adam. The virgin story is just as silly as the creation story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eugene39 Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Someone was talking to me several years ago about some movie or something where supposedly Jesus' blood was found and it only had 25(?) chromosomes? This ring a bell with anyone? I wasn't paying good attention! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
par4dcourse Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 The bible is full of myths. You seem to rely on the OT as factual. How does one discern the truth from fiction? Does the age of the story, such as JC vs. , oh I don't know, the flood fable matter? God could flood the entire world, save Noah and famile, yet not knock up a virgin? I don't understand the reasoning involved. Care to share? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Someone was talking to me several years ago about some movie or something where supposedly Jesus' blood was found and it only had 25(?) chromosomes? This ring a bell with anyone? I wasn't paying good attention! Really? That's funny. I wonder though, did God create a gamete (sperm cell) that fertilized Mary's ova, or did God just create the haploid directly in the ova? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
par4dcourse Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 I wonder though, did God create a gamete (sperm cell) that fertilized Mary's ova, or did God just create the haploid directly in the ova? Joseph was the first man in history to get sloppy firsts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eugene39 Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Someone was talking to me several years ago about some movie or something where supposedly Jesus' blood was found and it only had 25(?) chromosomes? Took me awhile but here's what he was talking about. http://www.theforbid...he_covenant.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Took me awhile but here's what he was talking about. http://www.theforbid...he_covenant.htm Wow. Just wow. Quote from their website: "It was identified as human blood for sure but there was a difference." It can't be identified as human blood if it doesn't have the same number of chromosomes. It's beyond crazy when they say things like that. Unless their sample had 24 chromosome pairs, which means Jesus was a Neaderthal or any other Hominidae, but not Homo sapiens. But that's not what they mean or says. They actually says that it was only 24 in total. They claim that Jesus had the haploid DNA from Mary and only one additional Y chromosome. The problem is that the cell will not work unless there's a diploid DNA. And the cell function and structure is inherited from the ova (hence from Mary), so Mary must have been a divine being as well with a super-special cell structure. Btw, even earthworms have more chromosomes than Jesus. Jesus DNA was closer to maise or wheat than human. --- Btw, Ron Wyatt is the Christian version of David Icke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
par4dcourse Posted January 1, 2011 Share Posted January 1, 2011 Thanks for the link, Eugene! I am out of breath from laughing. Another gentleman who was with Ron also heard and saw the angel. of course no clue as to this "another gentleman" was. And a photo would have been worth a million at the Randi foundation. Ron tired to take pictures of the cavern's contents but God didn't allow it. He used a polaroid, a 35mm, and a video camera and all film turned out blank. Darn! Ron has the worst luck. Angel forgot to tell him to turn the flash on. He coulda' been a contendah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest I Love Dog Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 The concept of xtianity is so stupid it really makes one wonder how we could have been so fooled - and the concept of the trinity is equally bizzare - considering it is pagan to the core. However I have often wondered if one confronted xtians on what did happen to jc's foreksin considering you believe he is god and what happend to his holy poo? If he was god it would still be around! Perish the thought!! Interestingly, at one time there were 18 Jesus foreskins on display across Europe, so they did survive! Imagine a god with 18 penises! The mind boggles. Of course, the RCC always have an answer, and they stated that Jesus relics were so holy that they were self-replicating! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Interestingly, at one time there were 18 Jesus foreskins on display across Europe, so they did survive! Imagine a god with 18 penises! The mind boggles. It must be an effect of the 24 chromosome haploid DNA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpheliaGinger Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Someone was talking to me several years ago about some movie or something where supposedly Jesus' blood was found and it only had 25(?) chromosomes? This ring a bell with anyone? I wasn't paying good attention! When I was a believer, I believed that Jesus had to have had 24 chromosomes because just had to put one male chromosome into Mary's egg. Now I know such fanciful ideas are just biologically impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
★ Citsonga ★ Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Not finished yet ... holy semen .. which impregnated mary as the xtians believe - think about it folks GODS SEMEN IMPREGNATING MARY ...yes it does stretch the imagination does it not? And taking it to a full conclusion kind of blows ones mind! Agree. It's a weird thing to think that God somehow created a gamete, with a haploid DNA and even complete with non-coding nucleotides. It would be just as easy for God to just create a full grown Jesus, like he supposedly did with Adam. The virgin story is just as silly as the creation story. Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? And if Jesus was God incarnate, why did he have a foreskin? And who'd want to be responsible for hacking on God's penis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ouroboros Posted January 2, 2011 Share Posted January 2, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? And he had nipples and a navel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanta Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overcame Faith Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 However I have often wondered if one xtians on what did happen to jc's foreksin considering you believe he is god and what happend to his holy poo? If he was god it would still be around! Perish the thought!! Okay, let's think about the foreskin issue from a theological standpoint. Circumcision was a sign of the covenant between god and men (literally men, not women). If Jesus was god, then why would he need to be circumcised because he was the covenant and not a recipient of the covenant? If Jesus was a man, the new Adam as Paul liked to say, then Jesus would not be circumcised because Adam was never circumcised since that practice did not begin until long after. If Paul was correct that Christians need not be circumcised and actively discouraged the practice among Christians (except for Timothy, of course, whom Paul personally circumcised), then Jesus had to be his example. And so Paul's vision must have included a glimpse of Jesus' uncircumcised penis. But, if as we assume from the story about Jesus being presented for the purification rites as was required by the Law of Moses in Luke 2:22-40 that Jesus was circumcised, then Jesus was not born a perfect man as Christians claim because his body had to be changed through the circumcision ritual to reach that which he (as god) required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
★ Citsonga ★ Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? He was supposedly created perfect, so if he had a foreskin then it was also perfect. If the foreskin was a perfect creation, then why would God later want it removed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanta Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? He was supposedly created perfect, so if he had a foreskin then it was also perfect. If the foreskin was a perfect creation, then why would God later want it removed? Does the Bible suggest that the foreskin should be removed because it is imperfect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
★ Citsonga ★ Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? He was supposedly created perfect, so if he had a foreskin then it was also perfect. If the foreskin was a perfect creation, then why would God later want it removed? Does the Bible suggest that the foreskin should be removed because it is imperfect? I don't believe so, but why would it be removed if it were perfect? Of course, it's silly to even debate this nonsense, since mythology is just silly to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vixentrox Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 The concept of xtianity is so stupid it really makes one wonder how we could have been so fooled - and the concept of the trinity is equally bizzare - considering it is pagan to the core. However I have often wondered if one confronted xtians on what did happen to jc's foreksin considering you believe he is god and what happend to his holy poo? If he was god it would still be around! Perish the thought!! Not finished yet ... holy semen .. which impregnated mary as the xtians believe - think about it folks GODS SEMEN IMPREGNATING MARY ...yes it does stretch the imagination does it not? And taking it to a full conclusion kind of blows ones mind! And of course it is another pagan belief!! My didn't we do well!! Christianity is as absurd of pretty much any faith though it is decidedly more evil than most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanta Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? He was supposedly created perfect, so if he had a foreskin then it was also perfect. If the foreskin was a perfect creation, then why would God later want it removed? Does the Bible suggest that the foreskin should be removed because it is imperfect? I don't believe so, but why would it be removed if it were perfect? Of course, it's silly to even debate this nonsense, since mythology is just silly to begin with. Ok. Not debating, just trying to learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
★ Citsonga ★ Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? He was supposedly created perfect, so if he had a foreskin then it was also perfect. If the foreskin was a perfect creation, then why would God later want it removed? Does the Bible suggest that the foreskin should be removed because it is imperfect? I don't believe so, but why would it be removed if it were perfect? Of course, it's silly to even debate this nonsense, since mythology is just silly to begin with. Ok. Not debating, just trying to learn. No biggie. I was basically just joking around with it, that's all. Take care.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phanta Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Did Adam have a foreskin? His penis was the only one created before the fall, so it shouldn't have had a foreskin, should it? Why wouldn't it? He was supposedly created perfect, so if he had a foreskin then it was also perfect. If the foreskin was a perfect creation, then why would God later want it removed? Does the Bible suggest that the foreskin should be removed because it is imperfect? I don't believe so, but why would it be removed if it were perfect? Of course, it's silly to even debate this nonsense, since mythology is just silly to begin with. Ok. Not debating, just trying to learn. No biggie. I was basically just joking around with it, that's all. Take care.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts