Kaiser01 Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 so i got into a debate today with my history teacher about the nature of quantium mechanics and the concept of Extraterestrial existance. the debate was brought up when a peer of mine said stephen hawking was a idiot becuase he belives in the posibility of aliens acording to his book "the universe in a nutshell"(witch i have read). my teacher however said the only reason he writes books is becuase he is in it for the money. ............. for one she started out saying she didnt even know who SH was and then she wants to say he is in it for the money. the man cant move anything but his cheek muscel and he wants to use science for money?!?!?!?! whats he going to do with it? upgrade his direct TV? i really felt insulted by such a arrogant comment. [/end rant] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WMDKitty Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Nah, it's to upgrade his space-age wheelchair. Speaking of, it's 2011 -- where's my hover-chair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpheliaGinger Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 This has to be a major face palm moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwc Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 It's all about the gold plated ramps and the sexy robot voice bitches. mwc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser01 Posted December 1, 2011 Author Share Posted December 1, 2011 lol i asked her if he was going to use it for better rimms on his chair and she just kind of looked at me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator florduh Posted December 1, 2011 Super Moderator Share Posted December 1, 2011 That is one ignorant fucking "teacher." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wester Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 The man holds Isaac Newton's chair at Cambridge. Last I checked Cambridge isn't Fox News. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotherJosh Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 I doubt Stephen Hawking would care what some incompetent history teacher said about him when he is probably more interested in probing the mysteries of the universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike D Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Even if he did write books for the money, so what? He's one of the most respected physicists and cosmologists in the world - he earned whatever he gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev R Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Wait until his army of Daleks is completed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ro-bear Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 I hope she is better at teaching history than she is at psychoanlyzing physicist authors whom she has never met. I doubt it, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser01 Posted December 1, 2011 Author Share Posted December 1, 2011 she is actualy a pretty smart woman when it comes to goverment and politics but in science she is very nieve, also she is a republican but i dont think that has as much to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inqui Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 she is actualy a pretty smart woman when it comes to goverment and politics but in science she is very nieve, also she is a republican but i dont think that has as much to do with it. Heheheh, I know all generalisations are bad but.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike D Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 she is actualy a pretty smart woman when it comes to goverment and politics but in science she is very nieve, also she is a republican but i dont think that has as much to do with it. She's Republican but anit-capitalist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser01 Posted December 2, 2011 Author Share Posted December 2, 2011 no she isnt anti capitalist in fact she is a biusness owner (tree farm if you consider that a biusness) but she just thinks that stephen hawking is out for the money just like her and in her opinion everybody else in the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mymistake Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 she is actualy a pretty smart woman when it comes to goverment and politics but in science she is very nieve, also she is a republican but i dont think that has as much to do with it. Heheheh, I know all generalisations are bad but.... Yes. It's true! All generalizations are bad! Every last one!!! Always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vigile Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 Even if he did write books for the money, so what? He's one of the most respected physicists and cosmologists in the world - he earned whatever he gets. Ha! The same teacher probably worships dumb jocks that get multi million dollar contracts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
older Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 I'd stand up to her and suggest that she find out something about the most respected physicist in modern times before she makes unfair and ignorant judgments about him. I'd put her right on the spot and say it just like I just wrote it. She deserves a put-down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts