scotter Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 Refer to http://www.godandscience.org/cults/praytruth.html Testing scripture for truth The Bible itself defines how religious writings are to be tested for truth: 1. Prophecies come to fulfillment with 100 percent accuracy (Deuteronomy 18:20-22). 2. Support the laws, precepts, and principles set forth in the rest of Scripture-without contradiction (Isaiah 8:20; Matthew 5:17; John 10:35) 3. Communicate only truth, in all disciplines of knowledge (Psalms 119:160; Hebrews 6:18) Scotter playing skeptic: 1. Destruction of Tyre is one, not mentioning Jesus as the fulfilled Messiah (see Colosseum) - notice the emphasis is 100% 2. Paul said scrap the Law -> Paul is a fraud, but his letters are contained in the Bible 3. there are scientific experts in the area. I am merely mentioning the contradiction within the Bible - then they (the books and chapters) can't be all true. (see Colosseum Biblical Inerrancy thread) Imbecile this is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LloydDobler Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 Refer to http://www.godandscience.org/cults/praytruth.html Testing scripture for truth The Bible itself defines how religious writings are to be tested for truth: 1. Prophecies come to fulfillment with 100 percent accuracy (Deuteronomy 18:20-22). 2. Support the laws, precepts, and principles set forth in the rest of Scripture-without contradiction (Isaiah 8:20; Matthew 5:17; John 10:35) 3. Communicate only truth, in all disciplines of knowledge (Psalms 119:160; Hebrews 6:18) Scotter playing skeptic: 1. Destruction of Tyre is one, not mentioning Jesus as the fulfilled Messiah (see Colosseum) - notice the emphasis is 100% 2. Paul said scrap the Law -> Paul is a fraud, but his letters are contained in the Bible 3. there are scientific experts in the area. I am merely mentioning the contradiction within the Bible - then they (the books and chapters) can't be all true. (see Colosseum Biblical Inerrancy thread) Imbecile this is. I agree with you, but I'd like to ask, can you back up the assertion that Paul was a fraud with some more detail? I haven't done that study myself and I'd like to see where you're coming from with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotter Posted December 12, 2005 Author Share Posted December 12, 2005 Sorry for the late reply Lloyd and readers. This morning I placed the thread and took off to work. This is a substantial link on Paul: http://www.sullivan-county.com/news/paul/paul.htm Click on other article links on Paul and Christianity, religions. Further scroll down and inquire on the religion pigeon holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffXL Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 This is a substantial link on Paul: http://www.sullivan-county.com/news/paul/paul.htm That is excellent! Paul's amazing ignorance of the "canonical' Gospels is astounding. He quotes Jesus once: "It is better to give than to receive," (Acts 20:34-36) but nowhere in the Gospels does Jesus say this. And in Acts 10, there's Peter's bizarre dream about eating what was once non-kosher, which is not necessary since Jesus made all foods clean in Mark 7:19. Another great site is http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/paul.html which I picked up on the boards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Neil Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 A Christian refuting Mormonism. Like the pot calling the kettle black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MQTA Posted December 12, 2005 Share Posted December 12, 2005 ya think they're jealous? I find on CF the ones with the Mormon icons are easier to communicate with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueGiant Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 Well, in a rare bit of defense for Paul, the cannonical gospels were not written when he would have had to write his letters. Man, gotta love Christians, five in the cylender, one in the foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkepticOfBible Posted December 15, 2005 Share Posted December 15, 2005 I agree with you, but I'd like to ask, can you back up the assertion that Paul was a fraud with some more detail? I haven't done that study myself and I'd like to see where you're coming from with that. If you go to the site given in the signature, there are some very good articles there, along with counter apologetic answers/ Enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts