Jump to content
Goodbye Jesus

The Shroud Is Real?


Kris

Recommended Posts

     To get jesus DNA just go to Catholic Mass during lord's supper.  Wait for them to ingest "host" so it magically morphs into "jesus."  Rip sample from lots of people (because of contamination that could take place).  Do "science-y" stuff on lots of samples and you're all done.  Go compare to beach towel.

 

          mwc

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

     To get jesus DNA just go to Catholic Mass during lord's supper.  Wait for them to ingest "host" so it magically morphs into "jesus."  Rip sample from lots of people (because of contamination that could take place).  Do "science-y" stuff on lots of samples and you're all done.  Go compare to beach towel.

 

          mwc

LOL! ^^^

I wonder when they realize that ritual is stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man on the shroud is too tall. Average height for the time/area is 5'2, plus the long hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man on the shroud is too tall. Average height for the time/area is 5'2, plus the long hair.

I beg to differ! Everyone knows, especially in THIS country, that all of the men were between 6'1 and 6'3. They all had short blonde hair and blue eyes. And most importantly, they were all Republicans! Don't you know your history? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest r3alchild

Theres no known history to the shroud before the 13 century, so that should be a dead give away. Also years ago when they tested a corner of the shroud it was dated to that time. I think its a 13 century work of art.

 

Radiocarbon 14 dating of the Shroud of Turin

The *Shroud of Turin

,* a linen cloth commonly associated with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus Christ

, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most notable of which is radiocarbon dating

, in an attempt to determine the relic

's authenticity. In 1988, scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of 1260–1390CE, which coincides with the first appearance of the shroud in France in the 1350s.[1]

 

These results are generally accepted by the scientific community. This dating has been questioned by some, and doubts have been raised in particular regarding the representivity of the sample that was taken for testing. The various alternative hypotheses have all been refuted by scientists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.