LukeExChristian Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 If one things for sure, Kenneth Copeland never gets tired of bible study porn. Multiple relatives get up EARLY in the mornings and "study" the bible. No, not "study the bible" i mean " 'study' the bible" let me explain. 2:50 through 4:50 of this episode of BVOV is GENUINELY interesting because I had actually never heard this before... (you can watch the rest I guess but it is mostly just unbacked theology) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yRKqPLNXNeE Now... I immediately researched this and I found different interesting articles. It turns out there is theological disagreement on which day it happened. I still think the whole bible is manmade ideas but it was still interesting to find out. MY POINT: compare that last paragraph, with 4:57 through 5:50... i doubt i am the first to figure this out, but pastors like kenneth have a clever way of covering up contradictions in the bible. instead of calling them contradictions, they're "revelations" (except the blatantly apparent contradictions he'll NEVER bring up on-air) let me give you an example... all 4 gospels disagree about what the soldiers gave to jesus to drink on the cross. Luke says it was vinegar matthew says it was vinegar mixed with gall "glory to god! revelation! it was not just vinegar they gave him" john says it was vinegar and hyssop "glory to god! revelation! it was not just vinegar and gall hyssop too. such deep revelation from the Word." See what I'm getting at here? It's amazing what you can believe if you make the bible out to be a perfect non-contradictory book just by default. p.s. By the way kenny... mark 15:42 ...checkmate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnFundEd Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 If one things for sure, Kenneth Copeland never gets tired of bible study porn. Multiple relatives get up EARLY in the mornings and "study" the bible. No, not "study the bible" i mean " 'study' the bible" let me explain. 2:50 through 4:50 of this episode of BVOV is GENUINELY interesting because I had actually never heard this before... (you can watch the rest I guess but it is mostly just unbacked theology) Now... I immediately researched this and I found different interesting articles. It turns out there is theological disagreement on which day it happened. I still think the whole bible is manmade ideas but it was still interesting to find out. MY POINT: compare that last paragraph, with 4:57 through 5:50... i doubt i am the first to figure this out, but pastors like kenneth have a clever way of covering up contradictions in the bible. instead of calling them contradictions, they're "revelations" (except the blatantly apparent contradictions he'll NEVER bring up on-air) let me give you an example... all 4 gospels disagree about what the soldiers gave to jesus to drink on the cross. Luke says it was vinegar matthew says it was vinegar mixed with gall "glory to god! revelation! it was not just vinegar they gave him" john says it was vinegar and hyssop "glory to god! revelation! it was not just vinegar and gall hyssop too. such deep revelation from the Word." See what I'm getting at here? It's amazing what you can believe if you make the bible out to be a perfect non-contradictory book just by default. p.s. By the way kenny... mark 15:42 ...checkmate. Guys like Copeland build such huge theological houses that are so very far out on a limb that one has to wonder at the fact that the branch has not been long ago broken. I think your insights are interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts