George

Is there a proof to show that Paul and Gospels are referring to the same character?

Recommended Posts

somehow I feel that Bible manufacturers  picked 3 different sets of books i..,e.,   Paul's letters,  3 synoptic gospels, Gospel John tied them together to create a character called Jesus a.k.a. Christ.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


PLEASE EXCUSE THE ANNOYING COMMERCIAL BREAKS IN THE CONVERSATION:

As with everything these days, the cost of keeping the Ex-C forum up and running has been rising. Inflation? In part, but the primary reason is this: As participation in the forums grows, costs increase. The Ex-C forums will remain free of charge to everyone, but if you believe this little corner of the Internet provides value to you or others, and you feel inclined to help keep us online, please consider making a one-time donation or becoming a regular contributor. Contribution options appear under the "Upgrade" link above, and can be accessed by clicking here.

Oh, and as an incentive (no, you won't be given any bogus promises of eternal bliss), if you do become a regular contributor by signing up for any monthly or yearly patron package, this annoying ADVO will disappear.

And now, back to the regularly scheduled conversation...



It seems to me they took more than just those three to compile the composite of jesus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/13/2019 at 5:44 AM, George said:

somehow I feel that Bible manufacturers  picked 3 different sets of books i..,e.,   Paul's letters,  3 synoptic gospels, Gospel John tied them together to create a character called Jesus a.k.a. Christ.

 

Here's some commentary on that general sentiment: 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's quite clear that Paul's Jesus is quite different from, say, Mark's Jesus. You're right as well that John presents a significantly different version than the synoptic gospels do.

 

If you haven't already, I'd suggest reading Misquoting Jesus and Jesus, Interrupted by Bart Ehrman. Some relevant stuff there. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Answering the original question. Scholarly research has established that Paul’s Jesus is a Spiritual being not an earthly one. Nothing in Paul’s writing even suggest Paul’s was aware an earthly Jesus ever existed. Paul seems to think Jesus was crucified in the Spiritual realm not on earth. 

 

Robert M Price,  Richard Carrier,  David Fitzgerald, and Hermann Detering are good scholarly resources. These scholars acknowledge there is no historical evidence that either Jesus or Paul ever existed in the flesh. The evidence suggest they were both literary figures not actual people. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now