Scientific Legalism

[JohnnyWishbone]

http://clearlyexplained.com/answers/membranetheory.html

[disillusioned]

1 hour ago, hyperferion said:

http://clearlyexplained.com/answers/membranetheory.html

 

Yeah, that's M-theory. If you want, I can go into more detail about why I don't think it's really science. But I don't have time at the moment. Let me know if you're interested,  and I'll get back to you in a day or two. 

[JohnnyWishbone]

2 minutes ago, disillusioned said:

 

Yeah, that's M-theory. If you want, I can go into more detail about why I don't think it's really science. But I don't have time at the moment. Let me know if you're interested,  and I'll get back to you in a day or two. 

Sure, that sounds pretty cool.

[Joshpantera]

13 hours ago, hyperferion said:

http://clearlyexplained.com/answers/membranetheory.html

 

That's the Ekpyrotic Theory of branes contacting one another which has been competitive to multiverse cosmology. This is something that our friend Mark was very involved with near the end of his life. I have several PM's concerning the issue. Basically, he was sending me links to observable evidence favoring inflationary theory (multiverse) and putting string theory and it's variants (Ekrpyrotic) further out of the picture. I do miss the hot up to date cosmological discussions we used have when he was here. 

 

 

 

[disillusioned]

21 hours ago, hyperholiday said:

Sure, that sounds pretty cool.

 

Please see my post here. To me, this topic seemed worthy of its own thread.