Jump to content

Any thoughts on what i just found?


Recommended Posts

Want to know the Truth about the true powers of this world, Reality + what our lives are truly all about. Trump beleaves in our Father in Heaven, and by the way, the ARK of the COVENANT has been found in Jeremiah's Grotto, right under where YESHUA=Jesus was crucified. So HIS BLOOD + WATER that came out when He was stabbed by the spear could run down the crack in the bedrock, that happened when the earth quaked + landed on the correct side of the ARK, that was placed there many hundreds of years earlier. His dried BLOOD was still alive even, + tested as only having 24 CHROMOSOMES = Virgin Born + proving HIS DIVINITY.. (only had one parent= regular 46, which is 23 chromosomes each) + with only one male Y chromosome from the Father. - PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8TRoQk6WUE @ (41:41) = HIS Blood is STILL ALIVE + had only 24 chromosomes = 23 from his mother + only One from His Father (normal people have 46 = 23 from the mother + 23 from the father). If these videos have been taken down, then in YouTube search these words = ( ark of covenant blood Ron Wyatt ) - Sorry guys + gals, but the higher up elite of mankind has decided to believe + side with these aliens (fallen angels + Nephilim) = sons+daughters of the children of fallen angels + human females in building these particle colliders - which mess with our timelines. - Isn't it amazing what knowledge we can gain by simply adding the “il-s” of life, into this evil theory.,, EVil-sOLUTION. Evolution never happened,,, and it never had the time, so it could have happened,,,, because we have only been here on this earth for about 6000 years. Think about the odds of us on this earth that is constantly gaining mass from space dust and meteors, revolving around a sun that is always losing mass from burning fuel=mass. If mankind has evolved over billions of years, then why is there only about 6000 years worth of space dust on the moon = see the moon landings, there are only a few cms of space dust. If evolution ever happened, then it needed the moon to keep the oceans from becoming stagnant water. - WHERE ARE THE THE BILLIONS OF YEARS WORTH OF DUST DEPOSIT. Surely that would have produce meters of dust, as would not the dust have been even thicker way back then + Don't try to tell me that something or someone removed the dust every so many thousand years. - DO THE MATH FOR YOUR SELF = the amount of dust deposit is known,,, + the amount deposited per year is known too. I did the math in the early '90s, and it worked out to be about 6000 years worth of dust that is on the moon now. I don't know if they use the same figures now or not. But even so, it should be obvious that after even one billion years,,,, the dust should be many meters thick. + TRUTH about COVID-19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_vNWmqWmZc - Perpetual Geometrical Electricity Multiplication can power all things. TESLA was right + free AC electricity multiplication is easily done using PULLEYS =(wheels). This simple technology is even, Found in the Bible @ (Ezekiel 1:16), as the inner workings of a UFO motor. "a wheel in the middle of a wheel" or, a small wheel running around the inside of a large wheel. Or a small cog in the middle of a large cog, with two medium-size cogs of the same tread in between the large outer cog and the small inner cog. Do you see why I chose to use pulleys + belt/elastic/rope/or a piece of tied rope or string, instead of cogs with both sizes of cogs + threads having to have meshed correctly? - This GEM-(free energy technology) is so simple that it should be obvious-(but it has been hidden by evil spirits). Just think of this small amount of logic,,, it only takes an input of a few sparks,(short bursts of current) to rotate a large 33 cm circumference pulley,(about 10 cm diameter) once, giving you 33 cm of moving belt. Then, if you run this length of belt past 1 to 3 mini-pulleys of 1 cm circumference, with AC or DC motors/generators attached, this would give you an output of 33 or 99 cycles of AC or DC electricity. NOW TRY + TELL ME YOU CANNOT FREELY MULTIPLY ELECTRICITY with pulleys when you can gain 99 cycles of AC or DC electricity, from a few sparks,(short bursts) of DC current, which is the amount to rotate a DC motor with a large 33 cm circumference pulley once. - + Don't you listen to these evil spirits, whispering that torque is a problem, as this is a blatant lie. This is because more torque occurs when you need to produce more power, and the only power that you need to produce is the minute amount of current that it takes to crank over your single DC motor one single time. These many rotations of these few motors or generators only need to generate a few short bursts of current, which equals practically nothing, when it comes to current. - This costs such a minimum amount of cash = 2 DC motors of the same voltage, 1 large + 1 small pulley, a belt, strap, elastic or tied piece of rope or string, possibly 4 diodes for a rough full-wave bridge rectifier, a capacitor and a few wires to connect these components together. This is so simple to assemble that we could start making a GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplier) for almost every voltage that we might need or want. Please remember that a lot of these supplies might be laying around our homes, or you could easily and cheaply pick them up in a junkyard. And if you choose to use AC motors/generators, then you have to add a full-wave bridge rectifier, (4 diodes) in between your AC generator(s) and DC drive motor. - THIS GEM TECHNOLOGY IS SIMPLE LOGIC, THAT EVIL FORCES ARE HIDING. This website https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxpoiCFKmPg/ is almost identical to the idea that I was shown in the early 2000s as a Vision of a 10-speed bicycle going uphill in 10th gear + then back downhill in 1st gear + I soon put this GEM free energy technology on the web @ http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ Free energy can be generated using pulleys, because pulleys can be used to freely multiply the # of rotations + since AC electricity is generated by rotations, then we can use pulleys to freely multiply AC electricity. - This is a diagram https://free-energy.yolasite.com/picture-gallery.php that looks a lot like the wiring of this former “science experiment” YouTube video if you replace the battery with a capacitor + if you only attach one side of the capacitor. I used a battery instead of a capacitor to use any extra power to charge the battery, + also added a warning of how this could be a fire hazard, because of overcharging the battery. This free-energy website of mine was started in the early 2000s, so it was around for a long while, to inspire others of this ancient Ezekiel GEM technology - PLEASE,,,,,, JUST TAKE THE FEW MINUTES + BUILD THIS SUPER SIMPLE MECHANISM FOR YOURSELF. Just go to this website. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxpoiCFKmPg/ + see how truly simple this works, and is to build. Now please, go out and build as many of these super simple, and cheap to build, GEM free energy machines as you can, of all sizes and voltages. Or even better, convince the government to start generating it for us, getting rid of the pollution that we put into the air, and the radioactive stuff completely. - Have you ever heard of the MANDELA Effect? PLEASE CHECK THIS OUT,,,, + then try telling me that there is not a POWERFUL SPIRITUAL WARFARE going on in our world. This is a must-watch video. All of time and space are changing. Things that are true have been altered + CERN is the cause for these events - Here is one of the videos trying to let this scary information out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPrutcbaerQ&list=PLDIEv5nkqqEa0-u8DIzqpefKBAG0nkb7g&index=1 - + here is an explanation by the Physicists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHKmoBeNWWQ&list=PLDIEv5nkqqEa0-u8DIzqpefKBAG0nkb7g&index=2 - + here is a radio speaker's view on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1v19n5JBSDs&t - CERN Is Changing Our Timelines – Proof - Mandela Effect Part 1 Our Father, Who Art in Heaven, had set up a Door = deadline for His Son to come back by/before + it has the Quantum computer http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/ but that Door has already past = JAN 14.57, 2019 = 1st DOOR + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooZA0riSa9Y tells you what is the real story. (REALITY = this is the hidden elite, in high places doing this, not your governments) - This whole world + whole universe is made of atoms, which are super small + super complex mechanisms,(which we are still learning about),,, containing massive energy =(atomic weapons) We are supposed to believe that these many trillions of trillions of massively complex mechanisms were all created in an explosion = BIG BANG. + WHEN WE STILL, WITH ALL OF OUR MASSIVE INTELLECT, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO CREATE EVEN ONE SINGLE ATOMIC STRUCTURE. Do you see the utter stupidity of this EVil-sOLUTION conspiracy? - http://aliensandghosts.yolasite.com/ http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/ http://incaseofrapture.yolasite.com/ - Here is a website that shows you how quick + simple this GEM technology is to build https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=NxpoiCFKmPg - + here is a website that I set up to discuss how this GEM technology works https://www.facebook.com/groups/274842009339398/ - TRUTH ABOUT CERN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49dGknES0-w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooZA0riSa9Y D-WAVE COMPUTER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1v19n5JBSDs&t=305s GIANTS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weDkUZA5PTI UFO's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7CM54HODGo RELEASING DARKNESS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TA-z6RrXRo ARTIFICIAL ORGANISM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-arVyMQMi1M EXTREME NATURE CHANGES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HnSOZXZdWU ILLUMINATI PLAN FOR HUMANITY

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I’m not sure what your state of mind was when you posted this.  Can you tell us - briefly - what your point is?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderator

I would question the sanity of whomever wrote this.  Hence the reactions by myself and the Prof.   Reassured to know you didn’t write it yourself but I’m concerned that you might be impressed by that kind of ranting.  I’d suggest instead you take a look at this summary of arguments for and against Christianity.   This is what coherent information looks like...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, that post is a rambling pile of junk science mixed with conspiracy theories.  Bad spelling, no paragraph breaks and no clear line where one thought ends and the next begins.  Everything listed can be easily rebutted, but rather than write up a massive reply that most people wouldn't care about, how about telling us if there is any subject in particular that you would like to understand better?

 

Just one example: 

15 hours ago, Mrjukes21 said:

why is there only about 6000 years worth of space dust on the moon = see the moon landings, there are only a few cms of space dust

We know that space dust is rare and only accumulates at about 1mm per 1000 years.  Based on it being a few cms thick it already will have taken much longer than young earth creationists would allow. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the first two sentences and kind of lightly scanned the rest. Not being a psychologist/psychiatrist it's just a guess this person was in a manic state when they wrote this word salad. Extra points given for the use of CAPS, plus signs and equals signs. 

 

Seriously though, I can almost guarantee that within five minutes of parking my car downtown, I will see someone in shabby clothes, probably pushing a shopping cart, carrying on a conversation with himself about something just like the original post here. The difference is he just doesnt have a way to post it online. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderator

"Any thoughts on what I just found?"

 

Sure - it's horse shit. 

 

Why are you wasting time reading such garbage?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/16/2021 at 8:38 AM, Mrjukes21 said:

I found this comment on youtube. I didnt make it

 

When you find somebody else material you should put it in quotes, tell your source, then briefly comment on it. If not, readers can think you're nuts and need your meds as in this material. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderator
On 2/16/2021 at 11:38 AM, Mrjukes21 said:

I found this comment on youtube. I didnt make it

 

Ok, good. 

 

Because it IS a bunch of horse shit if you want the answer. It's a string of conspiracies many of which have been debunked and refuted here in the past. Like the Mandela Effect, for instance. Ark of the covenant is another. But the whole thing is literally pure nonsense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, florduh said:

It has to be parody. Please tell me it's parody.

Never underestimate the stupid...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Mrjukes21

 

Are you trying to free yourself from Christianity or find excuses to believe again? If you are deconverting you gotta stop reading this BS. It will only serve to give you a temporary stay of faith. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of hard to read actually. 

    And by his public statements I would rather believe that Trump actually believes there is no God but Trump , and Rudy Giuliani is his messenger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an article about the idea of too little cosmic dust on the moon propagated by creationists. It is silly to take that piece seriously of course but look how much work it takes to clearly debunk even one crazy random claim like this.

 

https://ncse.ngo/space-dust-moons-surface-and-age-cosmos

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DanForsman said:

Here is an article about the idea of too little cosmic dust on the moon propagated by creationists. It is silly to take that piece seriously of course but look how much work it takes to clearly debunk even one crazy random claim like this.

 

https://ncse.ngo/space-dust-moons-surface-and-age-cosmos

Off-subject reply to your link. But as you pointed out, it is on-topic concerning the existence of religious nutballs such as young Earth creationists discussed in the opening post.

 

In your link they use the words scientific-creationists. All Abrahamic religions believe in God's creation of heaven and Earth. But very few scientists are young Earth creationists which this article is referring to. The very few that are, are in the humanities such as psychology and sociology. Outside these fields there are a very few such nutballs in medicine, mostly in general practice, and mostly in or from third world countries.

 

But this article refers to young Earth creationists that involves generally no scientists that have anything to do with the moon scientifically. It's also interesting and maybe peculiar that in this link they discuss what they thought the surface of the moon should look like before we got there, and what it actually looks like after we took pictures of it. It is much more weathered looking implying a lot of erosion. Erosion like this comes with an atmosphere of gases and liquids that have long ago disappeared from the moon's surface. So the moon looks older than they thought it would and what they thought was more than 4 billion years old. Of course the rocks we brought back give us a more exact date of 4.53 billion years old, almost as old as the Earth 4.543 billion years old.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how many hours and dollars of human capital have been spent trying to prove that biblical events actually took place and that biblical claims are factual. I'm not talking about anything spiritual which does fulfill at least some human needs but the searching and excavating and testing and endlessly analyzing in an attempt to scientifically prove one biblical reference or another. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, DanForsman said:

I wonder how many hours and dollars of human capital have been spent trying to prove that biblical events actually took place and that biblical claims are factual......

 

Far too many hours and too much money have been foolishly spent I'm sure.  It appears that it can take hundreds or even thousands of years to include the lower echelons of society educationally into some of the simplest scientific understandings. 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, florduh said:

It has to be parody. Please tell me it's parody.

 

You're right. The opening post would make an excellent parody concerning the stupidity of young Earth creationists.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/16/2021 at 4:42 PM, Mrjukes21 said:

Want to know the Truth

So, Mrjukes21, what are your thoughts on what you have posted? Are you thinking it's ridiculous or do you have worries something might be true amongst the ramblings? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Super Moderator

Imagine how many diseases we could have cured by now if pharmaceutical scientists didn't have to stop working every five minutes to explain to some soccer mom Karen why David Wolfe is an idiot.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, pantheory said:

 

But very few scientists are young Earth creationists which this article is referring to. The very few that are, are in the humanities such as psychology and sociology. Outside these fields there are a very few such nutballs in medicine, mostly in general practice, and mostly in or from third world countries.

 

I don't know where you saw that, but in my 35 years of experience I never saw any Psychologist  or Sociologist in the USA that held those views.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Weezer said:

I don't know where you saw that, but in my 35 years of experience I never saw any Psychologist  or Sociologist in the USA that held those views.

 

Yeah, I hope not. But scientists in the humanities, social scientists, tend to be more religious than scientists in the natural sciences as I stated above. For those that are religious doesn't mean that they are young Earth creationists or believe in ridiculous things such as the OP.  Only a very few of these might believe in religious nonsence.

 

https://news.rice.edu/2005/08/25/social-scientists-more-likely-than-natural-scientists-to-be-religious/

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, pantheory said:

 

Yeah, I hope not. But scientists in the humanities, social scientists, tend to be more religious than scientists in the natural sciences as I stated above. For those that are religious doesn't mean that they are young Earth creationists or believe in ridiculous things such as the OP.

 

https://news.rice.edu/2005/08/25/social-scientists-more-likely-than-natural-scientists-to-be-religious/

 

I can see that.  But most of the ones I knew were more "liberal" christians.  An interesting tid bit.  An uncle of mine was a sociology professor at Texas Christian University, but after he retired it was discovered that in his latter years he had decided he was agnostic, but kept quiet until after retirement.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.