Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 54 minutes ago, SemmelweisReflex said: Another one is an educated ruffian who's absolute control is so paramount to his very survival that he takes an almost predatory sexual fiend's delight in exercising it. Aww... I think someone has a crush on me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemmelweisReflex Posted June 28, 2021 Author Share Posted June 28, 2021 23 minutes ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: https://www.grammarly.com/blog/whos-whose/#:~:text=Both who's and whose come,it's two words stuck together.&text=Whose is a possessive pronoun,telling) to whom something belongs. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/its-vs-its/#:~:text=It's is a contraction of,to or refers to something. Yes, Dictator Einstein, but I'm not the one pretending that the abstract rules of grammar and pretense of education is important. Get that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemmelweisReflex Posted June 28, 2021 Author Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: Aww... I think someone has a crush on me! You are an amalgam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☆ DarkBishop ☆ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, SemmelweisReflex said: Yes, Dictator Einstein, but I'm not the one pretending that the abstract rules of grammar and pretense of education is important. Get that? Yeah, I think we all can see that you don't think education is important. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, SemmelweisReflex said: Yes, Dictator Einstein, but I'm not the one pretending that the abstract rules of grammar and pretense of education is important. Get that? True, but when you attempt to insult someone else's grammar using atrocious grammar of your own, you just come off looking like a fucknut. Of course, you don't need an educated ruffian, such as myself, to tell you that, do you, fucknut? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, SemmelweisReflex said: You are an amalgam. I'm also out of your league. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SemmelweisReflex Posted June 28, 2021 Author Share Posted June 28, 2021 Just now, SemmelweisReflex said: You are an amalgam. And by the way. Listen and learn. Pharmaceutical Science Market Michael Yeadon - Deception Of Pandemic Plandemic Vaccinated Unhealthiest - Unvaccinated Are Healthiest Killing Children By Forcing Mercury And Aluminum Into Their Bodies As Well As Adults: Thimerosal In Tetanus Nobel Prize Winner Montagnier: "Vaccines Are Causing Stronger Variants And Vaccination Death Charts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☆ DarkBishop ☆ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 minute ago, SemmelweisReflex said: Pharmaceutical Science Market Michael Yeadon - Deception Of Pandemic Plandemic Vaccinated Unhealthiest - Unvaccinated Are Healthiest Killing Children By Forcing Mercury And Aluminum Into Their Bodies As Well As Adults: Thimerosal In Tetanus Nobel Prize Winner Montagnier: "Vaccines Are Causing Stronger Variants And Vaccination Death Charts Vaccines are how you want to make yourself a martyr? Really? That's pathetic. You know @TheRedneckProfessor isn't gonna let this fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 4 minutes ago, DarkBishop said: Vaccines are how you want to make yourself a martyr? Really? That's pathetic. You know @TheRedneckProfessor isn't gonna let this fly. Meh, questionable sources are all conspiracy fucknuts have. Now when they try to put the weight of a legitimate source, such as the CDC or WHO, behind their conspiratorial fucknuttery, then I'll take issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☆ DarkBishop ☆ Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 16 minutes ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: Meh, questionable sources are all conspiracy fucknuts have. Now when they try to put the weight of a legitimate source, such as the CDC or WHO, behind their conspiratorial fucknuttery, then I'll take issue. 10/4 But it did look like a blatant attempt to get banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midniterider Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 Waits for Semmel to say something worthwhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 32 minutes ago, DarkBishop said: 10/4 But it did look like a blatant attempt to get banned. One of many attempts he's made so far. But if there's even a picoliter of intelligence floating around that barely sentient, pea-sized organ located directly behind his prominent brow ridge, he'll have learned from his last restriction and will not attempt to turn this into a demonstration of his anti-vaxxer stupidity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 36 minutes ago, midniterider said: Waits for Semmel to say something worthwhile. I waited for jesus to return, too. I feel ya, buddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdelsolray Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 I strongly suggest this one should be entirely ignored. That way, he will eventually stop posting and he can go back to playing with his QAnon and Jesus action figure sets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myrkhoos Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 hour ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: Meh, questionable sources are all conspiracy fucknuts have. Now when they try to put the weight of a legitimate source, such as the CDC or WHO, behind their conspiratorial fucknuttery, then I'll take issue. A littIe offtopic. really doubt the legitimacy of the CDC and WHO. The same reason I doubt all high level org, including the FBI, CIA, EU, large political parties,churches. Lots of politics, lots of interests, lots of money. In general, eveything where there is high stakes of money and power you can almost guarantee some level of deception. Like modern sports and steroids :)). One of the reasons, main one, I regard authority with the level of suspicion of advertising. This does not mean I reject their claim. I just take into consideration different elements when thinking how much trust I should place in their statements. Not that Flat earth society has the same level of trust as NASA :)). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator florduh Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 1 hour ago, Myrkhoos said: A littIe offtopic. really doubt the legitimacy of the CDC and WHO. The same reason I doubt all high level org, including the FBI, CIA, EU, large political parties,churches. Lots of politics, lots of interests, lots of money. In general, eveything where there is high stakes of money and power you can almost guarantee some level of deception. Like modern sports and steroids :)). One of the reasons, main one, I regard authority with the level of suspicion of advertising. This does not mean I reject their claim. I just take into consideration different elements when thinking how much trust I should place in their statements. Not that Flat earth society has the same level of trust as NASA :)). Clearly, any endeavor involving humans will eventually see some corruption. Unfortunately, nobody other than Semi-Wise can be an expert in every discipline so we all have to take that leap of faith and sometimes just trust our doctor, lawyer or investment counselor. Typically such experts or large organizations like WHO have a track record we can check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 2 hours ago, sdelsolray said: I strongly suggest this one should be entirely ignored. That way, he will eventually stop posting and he can go back to playing with his QAnon and Jesus action figure sets. I don't think anyone is really taking him seriously anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator florduh Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 4 hours ago, sdelsolray said: QAnon and Jesus action figure sets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 28, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 28, 2021 39 minutes ago, florduh said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdelsolray Posted June 28, 2021 Share Posted June 28, 2021 2 hours ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: I don't think anyone is really taking him seriously anymore. ...which should make is easier for folks to ignore him and not respond to his posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alreadyGone Posted June 29, 2021 Share Posted June 29, 2021 4 hours ago, Myrkhoos said: A littIe offtopic. really doubt the legitimacy of the CDC and WHO. ... That's the thing about human beings when they become enmeshed in large organizations.. and the connections + power that so often entails. Even with the best of intentions. And the power of influential organizations draws also those with the opposite of "best intentions" as well.. Everyone should read Sinclair Lewis' "Arrowsmith". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myrkhoos Posted June 29, 2021 Share Posted June 29, 2021 8 hours ago, florduh said: Clearly, any endeavor involving humans will eventually see some corruption. Unfortunately, nobody other than Semi-Wise can be an expert in every discipline so we all have to take that leap of faith and sometimes just trust our doctor, lawyer or investment counselor. Typically such experts or large organizations like WHO have a track record we can check. Of course. But I would not call it a leap of faith. Just hopefully rational risk-taking. And this can be tweaked. I just worry when people elevate anyone to a infailibility like position. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alreadyGone Posted June 29, 2021 Share Posted June 29, 2021 1 hour ago, Myrkhoos said: ...I just worry when people elevate anyone to a infailibility like position. Is that why it was necessary to invent 'Jesus'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator TheRedneckProfessor Posted June 29, 2021 Super Moderator Share Posted June 29, 2021 4 hours ago, Myrkhoos said: I just worry when people elevate anyone to a infailibility like position. I'm not sure I see the connection between FDA regulations and a position of infallibility. Drugs get recalled sometimes because, "opps, we made a mistake." Sometimes it's a mistake by the manufacturer; sometimes the FDA overlooked something in the approval process. Either way, the fact that the system is fallible, and attempts to be self-correcting, should lend itself to greater trust. Same thing with CDC guidelines. It's not about not making mistakes; it's about analyzing and applying historical data to ensure the same mistakes don't keep happening every time there's an outbreak or pandemic. It is a matter of public record that the 1919 Spanish Flu pandemic was much worse than it needed to be. The reason? Anti-maskers and people refusing to quarantine. Sound familiar? CDC guidelines are in place as a measure against our own willful ignorance fueled by conspiracy b.s. like Semi-Wise has linked above. Now back to our regularly scheduled program, already in progress... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myrkhoos Posted June 29, 2021 Share Posted June 29, 2021 1 hour ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: I'm not sure I see the connection between FDA regulations and a position of infallibility. Drugs get recalled sometimes because, "opps, we made a mistake." Sometimes it's a mistake by the manufacturer; sometimes the FDA overlooked something in the approval process. Either way, the fact that the system is fallible, and attempts to be self-correcting, should lend itself to greater trust. Is it self correcting though? Or is it captured by special interests. Again and again. Like secret service sponsored coups in South America 1 hour ago, TheRedneckProfessor said: Same thing with CDC guidelines. It's not about not making mistakes; it's about analyzing and applying historical data to ensure the same mistakes don't keep happening every time there's an outbreak or pandemic. It is a matter of public record that the 1919 Spanish Flu pandemic was much worse than it needed to be. The reason? Anti-maskers and people refusing to quarantine. Sound familiar? CDC guidelines are in place as a measure against our own willful ignorance fueled by conspiracy b.s. like Semi-Wise has linked above. Now back to our regularly scheduled program, already in progress... Again, why do you trust their data and theur conclusions AND that they have actual good intentions? Excuse me, but my point was not failible systems per say, but corruption. Do you think Fauci and his obvious lying about masks is ok? I think your level of trust is unwarranted in those institutions. Edit. Again, Semi s opinions and done others seem to warrant much less. But my level of trust in official data is moderate at best. I learned that much from my exp in the Church :)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now