Jump to content

Another Missing Link Found... Birds

Guest Left of Larry

Recommended Posts

Guest Left of Larry

I'm new here, but this is my favorite type of forum Science....






Ancient Bird Fossil Offers Missing Link

By Randolph E. Schmid, Associated Press



June 15, 2006 — Dozens of fossils of an ancient loon-like creature that some say is the missing link in bird evolution have been discovered in northwest China.


The remains of 40 of the nearly modern amphibious birds, so well-preserved that some even have their feathers, were found in Gansu province, researchers report in Friday's issue of the journal Science.


Previously only a single leg of the creature, known as Gansus yumenensis, had been found.


"Gansus is a missing link in bird evolution," said Matt Lamanna of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh.


"Most of the ancestors of birds from the age of dinosaurs are members of groups that died out and left no modern descendants. But Gansus led to modern birds, so it's a link between primitive birds and those we see today," Lamanna, a co-leader of the research team, said in a telephone interview.


It was similar to loons or diving ducks, he explained, and one of the fossils even has skin preserved between the toes, showing that it had webbed feet.


"Gansus is the oldest example of the nearly modern birds that branched off of the trunk of the family tree that began with the famous proto-bird Archaeopteryx," added Peter Dodson of the University of Pennsylvania, a co-author of the paper along with Lamanna, Hai-lu You of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, and others.


The remains were dated to about 110 million years ago, making them the oldest for the group Ornithurae, which includes all modern birds and their closest extinct relatives.


Previously, the oldest known fossils from this group were from about 99 million years ago.


The fact that Gansus was aquatic indicates that modern birds may have evolved from animals that originated in aquatic environments, the researchers said.


"Our new specimens are extremely well preserved, with some even including feathers," Lamanna said.


"Because these fossils are in such good condition, they've enabled us to reconstruct the appearance and relationships of Gansus with a high degree of precision. They provide new and important insight into the evolutionary transformation of carnivorous dinosaurs into the birds we know today."


The remains were found in an ancient lake bed near the town of Changma. Researchers split open slabs of mudstone to find them. It was like turning the pages of a book, Lamanna said.


"We went to Changma hoping that we'd discover one, maybe two, fragments of fossil birds," he said. "Instead, we found dozens, including some almost complete skeletons with soft tissues. We were successful beyond our wildest dreams."


The new fossil material "is remarkable for its excellent preservation and establishes that Gansus is an early member of the Ornithurae ... The new fossils demonstrate that Gansus clearly is a bird that spent much of its life looking for food in water," commented Hans-Dieter Sues, associate director for research and collections at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History.


Gansus is an additional "link in a long chain of intermediate forms between Archaeopteryx, the oldest known bird from the late Jurassic, and modern birds," said Sues, who was not part of Lamanna's research team.


Funding for the research was provided by the Discovery Quest program for The Science Channel, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Dixie State College of Utah, the Chinese Geological Survey and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.


At one point during the field work, Lamanna told his colleagues he would eat a duck foot if they found the fossil they were seeking while the television camera crew was still there.


So, did they?


"It tasted sort of like chicken, but real rubbery," he recalled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm new here, but this is my favorite type of forum Science....


I first heard about this on American Heathen! I can't believe I missed it! Better late then never, though.



I wouldn't call creationism in any of it's thousands of forms a "theory." It's more of a bare hypothesis, in my opinion. To call it a theory, in the scientific sense, is to give it way too much credit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't call creationism in any of it's thousands of forms a "theory." It's more of a bare hypothesis, in my opinion. To call it a theory, in the scientific sense, is to give it way too much credit
I wouldn't even call it a "bare hyposthesis," it is a belief.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.