Guest BackSlyder Posted June 30, 2007 Share Posted June 30, 2007 Is anyone here a fan of Bertrand Russell? Much of his work is great ammo for debating with Christians about various topics. Here is a quote from his 1927 lecture "Why I Am Not A Christian." "I am not for the moment concerned with whether there is a difference between right and wrong, or whether there is not: that is another question. The point I am concerned with is that, if you are quite sure there is a difference between right and wrong, then you are then in this situation: is that difference due to God's fiat (decree) or is it not? If it is due to God's fiat, then for God himself there is no difference between right and wrong, and it is no longer a significant statement to say that God is good. If you are going to say, as theologians do, that God is good, you must then say that right and wrong have some meaning which is independent of God's fiat, because God's fiats are good and not bad independently of the mere fact that he made them. If you are going to say that, you will then have to say that it is not only through God that right and wrong came into being, but that they are in their essence logically anterior to God. You could, of course, if you liked, say that there was a superior deity who gave orders to the God who made this world, or could take up the line that some of the agnostics took up -- a line which I often thought was a very plausible one -- that as a matter of fact this world that we know was made by the Devil at a moment when God was not looking. There is a good deal to be said for that, and I am not concerned to refute it." I tried to take the side of a christian and refute this, but all I could come up with is "God works in mysterious ways." LOL The more I think about it, the more bogus Christianity gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts