1. Special Announcements & FAQs

    1. Special Announcements

      Moderator announcement area for sharing items of interest.

    2. Frequently Asked Questions and Topics

      A collection of frequently asked questions and topics that have been already addressed on this site. This section was created with the express intention of assisting newcomers.

  2. Discussions

    1. Got Questions?

      Got questions about life, leaving the faith or how to use the features on this site? Just ask! 

    2. Introductions

      Introduce Yourself Here

    3. Testimonies of Former Christians

      Help encourage someone else who is trying to deprogram themselves from religion - tell them how you did it or are doing it.

    4. Rants and Replies

      Here is where you may take the opportunity to respond to or comment on any of the articles and rants posted on the Main Blog. Or, just start your own topic.

    5. Podcasts

      Listen to streaming podcasts from a variety of sources.

    6. Ex-Christian Life

      A forum to discuss how ex-Christians have dealt with family members, replaced the church as a place of community, reactions of your family, friends, church, acquaintances upon learning of the de-conversion, or anything else relevant to the Ex-Christian Life.

    7. Ex-Christian Spirituality

      This area is for those who have left Christianity for another form of theism or spirituality (Deism, Paganism, Wicca, Great Spirit, The Force, Buddhism, etc.).

    8. General Christian Theological Issues

      The Bible calls all those who do not believe in its god a fool.

    9. Science vs. Religion

      The bulk of science does not support belief in a deity, or does it? This is an open discussion area to hone your skills at supporting and understanding the various positions. Feel free to post any links of value in this important topic.

    10. News and Current Events

      Current news, some of which is supposedly upholding reason and therefore freedom.

    11. The Arena

      This section is confined to serious and formal debate. New topics will not appear in this section until approved by a moderator. For best results, contact a moderator before attempting to post a new topic in this section.

    12. Colosseum

      Or Coliseum, if you prefer. This section is for those members who would like to see and participate in informal, yet serious, debate. All posts are expected to remain "on topic" at all times.

    13. The Lion's Den

      Attention "True Christians" and former Christians.

      Before posting in this section, please read the Lion's Den Rules.

    14. Creative works

      Place to post stories, art, poetry, etc. that is done by members.

    15. Totally Off Topic

      Almost anything goes, including politics. Please confine political discussions to this area.



      And, try to play nice.


    16. Critic's Corner

      This area is for reviewing books, movies, etc.

    17. Humor and Satire

      Time to laugh!


  • Recent Status Updates

    • knightcore

      Finally put in my two weeks at my shitty job!! I am SO excited. And I'm about a month out from finishing school!!!!!
      · 2 replies
    • Riven

      Best thing I've read all day: How do you get past the fact that the Old Testament reads just like the blog of an early Iron Age tribe rather than the wisdom of the omniscient creator of the universe?
      Source here:
      · 0 replies
    • Riven

      Anti-intellectualism at its finest. I actually bought this book, and ageeed with all her teachings at one point. 
      The problem is that the “Christian tribe” see questions and inquiry as “cracks in your faith”, not healthy growth. 
      You are shamed and shut down. 

      · 7 replies
    • Riven

      Christians are very big on calling the Bible a “blueprint for living.”  So then why is it hazy about whether you should rip kids from their parents,  but perfectly clear about the prohibition of baking gay people a cake? #situationalethics 
      · 4 replies
    • LogicalFallacy

      Todays date is the 12-6-18... or if you are American its the 6-12-18... all divisible by 6 *Gasp* that's 3 6's... today is the number of the beast! 666! See I can still do Christian woowoo  
      · 0 replies
  • Recently Updated Topics

  • Recent Posts

    • Heh, so we're calling psychology a science now?  Mostly kidding, and before I offend Orbit I'll move on.   I read about this earlier this week. Indeed I too learned about this experiment in high school sociology, and was surprised to see such a foundational experiment overturned. Is this peer-review at work? Let me start with a controversial comment. Imagine this wasn't a seminal study in psychology, but in climate science. What if we determined that the anthropogenic contribution to climate change is in fact negligible? Well, that would be a problem given said study would have been responsible for carbon emission standards, international agreements, and a fundamental industrial shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. There would rightly be clamor over the fact that the earth's (political) axis was shifted on the basis of scientific work whose results were fundamentally overturned by later research.   Now, my point here isn't that climate science is flawed. To be clear, it isn't. The point I hope to make is that while science is naturally self-correcting, it is also meant to converge on the truth. Later theories should refine earlier theories rather than invalidate them. A famous example of this is the General Theory of Relativity, which makes corrections to Newtonian gravity rather than declaring it obsolete. So if the prison experiment were done properly, then later experiments would perhaps show that the results do not hold in certain circumstances or when certain types of people are participants. But here we have gross experimental errors. One participant faked a breakdown to get out of the experiment early. The PI changed his experimental protocol because of a suggestion from his girlfriend. These aren't the sorts of things that are meant to be corrected by peer review. These are things that simply shouldn't happen. It's akin to a climate researcher adding the number 6 to every temperature measurement he records. From what I'm reading here, it's simply science done poorly.   Scientific findings are always subject to dispute and refinement. But if the science is done correctly, successive findings should converge rather than contradict. The widespread non-reproducible nature of findings in the social sciences makes me worry about the veracity of this sort of research. Thank goodness social scientists are at least well-versed in statistics.
    • Yeah, no kidding. I remember one part where he purports to calculate the probability of Jesus's miracles not being a miracle. What the calculation is doing, if you can even call it that, is that *assuming* all the miracles happened the way they were described in the bible, literally, what the probability that they happened due to random occurrence. It is an extremely stupid thing to speculate as what's being debated is whether the biblical accounts of the miracles happened at all, *not* whether or not it's miraculous if you pre-assume that it happened! Of course this didn't occur or bother to him and he pursued as though he had proven that all the miracles were true. What a sack full of sh*t that whole argument was.
    • Now that's just plain NASTY! I LIKE it!   Think I'll wait until Mrs. MOHO has a couple glasses of grape juice in her before I pull that one. 
    • You have to get a license to drive a car; but not to have kids.  That seems a bit fuckity to me.