♦ nivek ♦ Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 What part of "Shall NOT be Infringed" do you NOT understand?The Libertarian Enterprise by Dennis Wilson "This week, Gun owners had their day in court, when the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the DC v. Heller case, which involves a challenge to the DC gun ban. According to a Gun Owners of America email bulletin, at some point, Justice John Paul Stevens asked Alan Gura, the attorney for Dick Heller, if it would be proper to say that the right protected in the Second Amendment shall not be 'unreasonably infringed?' To our shock and horror, Gura answered 'yes.' He did qualify his answer somewhat by saying 'we don't know' exactly what this 'unreasonable standard looks like.' But he conceded a significant amount of ground with his answer, because any ban would be 'reasonable' to Chuck Schumer and Sarah Brady." (03/24/08) http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2008/tle461-20080323-07.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts