SillyString Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 1 of 7: This is just ridiculousness. I don't know how he let this woman go on and on like she does...Ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mriana Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Where is the evidence? She talks about lay people doing observations etc... Has she LOOKED at a chimp? Has she LOOKED at a gorilla? They look a lot like us, except with more fur. They act a lot like us too. She sounds like an idiot and causes people to do the palm face. I suppose she doesn't treat other animals with respect too? She really does not know what science is or even respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser01 Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 i havent even watched this yet but i know where it is going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mriana Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Yup! Pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brought None Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 She really nose her science eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falloutdude Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Watched the whole thing before, she's an absolute moron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suzy Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 It's frustrating to watch. Whenever Dawkins corners her she changes the subject and whenever she can't answer something she ignores Dawkins and returns to repeating her mantras. "There is no evidence, there is no evidence" - and when Dawkins tells her where to find the evidence she demands, she ignores him. She seems to think if she talks a lot she will be convincing. Pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noumena Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 I'm annoyed by the way she smiles. And it irritated me that she chose to use a handicapped family member as an example of proof of a spirit and a soul. What? What does she mean by that? "....and yet many people continue to believe that God has a hand in creating us; I think helps to show that people are using their critical factories. They're not just believing what's being taught in the schools." ~~~~~ Hahahaha she said critical factories. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaToOmega Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 I worked out why Dawkin's has so much problem convincing people of evolution. Its his accent. He pronounces it, evil-oution. That naturally puts all fundies in a bind. They can't support something evil. I'll email him and see if changing his pronunciation helps. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noumena Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 I love Richard Dawkins. If only HE had been my dad. I like his convo here with Hawking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SillyString Posted September 15, 2011 Author Share Posted September 15, 2011 I worked out why Dawkin's has so much problem convincing people of evolution. Its his accent. He pronounces it, evil-oution. That naturally puts all fundies in a bind. They can't support something evil. I'll email him and see if changing his pronunciation helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Moderator florduh Posted September 15, 2011 Super Moderator Share Posted September 15, 2011 How ironic that some of those who insist our intrinsic value comes solely from being individual creations of God are often the ones who would discard the weaker members of society through legislation. She has very nice hair, though. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaiser01 Posted September 16, 2011 Share Posted September 16, 2011 i watched it.... i need a drink.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SillyString Posted September 16, 2011 Author Share Posted September 16, 2011 i watched it.... i need a drink.... Try watching all seven videos, you'd need a few drinks!!!! Richard is very respectful to her throughout all of them. It's pretty much the same in every video: She wants evidence, and he tells her about all the evidence, she ignores him, repeats the same thing over and over and over and over and over.... Silly creationists... fairy-tales are for kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaToOmega Posted September 17, 2011 Share Posted September 17, 2011 Well, I emailed Richard to tell him to change his pronunciation. We'll see if that helps. LOL I know him really well so maybe he'll take my advice. Damn, not one bite? Fine, my relationship with Richard is like a christian's with god. I know him but he knows nothing about me. Only our relationship is better. I can see him on youtube and online and on TV. So I know he is real and he makes sense. Plus he makes more than two books over the course of multiple millennium. I can only hear rumours about god, the books attributed to him are different and he isn't even the author. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatholiKitty Posted September 23, 2011 Share Posted September 23, 2011 Saw this for the first time a year ago. So. Much. Rage. at that woman with her ignorant smiles and condescending laughs. I can't even watch it all in one sitting. I'd go into details about her contradictions, but I think anyone from this site can see them without assistance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts