Check this guy out.

[Asimov]

http://fcnforums.christianity.com/m_607968/mpage_1/tm.htm

 

 

This guy is hilarious, I don't understand half the stuff he's talkin about but I'm havin fun anyways:

 

2nd, My whole point is that darwinists claim that dumb nature "made" DNA w/o any plans, purpose, foreknowledge, goal or guidance. On the contrary, smart humans with the abilities of logic, reason, creativity and millions of tons of material to work with, have been unable to accomplish, in n,000's of years, anything near DNA. You claim nature has done this, "without even trying" so to speak - in whatever time you choose - with no brains, no goal and no reason!!

 

3rd, you claim the natural processes have had "3.5 billion years to work on it". When did they actually start "working" on it? Why? When exactly did nature get started on DNA and when did it complete it as is? Do you know? No. All mutational rates evidence we have thus far says the darwinist view is wrong and seriously so. It seriously, even laughably, under-estimates the time factors and complexity involved.

 

 

That evidence says DNA was designed. You can give nature as many billions of years as you please it could never build anything like DNA w/o external help. Nature knows nothing of "usefullness", nor of "adapting" - the idea assumes a communication mechanism between nature itself and all organisms.

 

I end this post with :

 

quote:

 

‘A cell needs over 75 "helper molecules", all working together in harmony, to make one protein (R-group series) as instructed by one DNA base series. A few of these molecules are RNA (messenger, transfer, and ribosomal RNA); most are highly specific proteins.

 

‘When it comes to "translating" DNA’s instructions for making proteins, the real "heroes" are the activating enzymes. Enzymes are proteins with special slots for selecting and holding other molecules for speedy reaction. Each activating enzyme has five slots: two for chemical coupling, one for energy (ATP), and most importantly, two to establish a non-chemical three-base "code name" for each different amino acid R-group. You may find that awe-inspiring, and so do my cell-biology students! [Even more awe-inspiring, since the more recent discovery that some of the activating enzymes have editing machinery to remove errant products, including an ingenious "double sieve" system.]

 

‘And that’s not the end of the story. The living cell requires at least 20 of these activating enzymes I call "translases," one for each of the specific R-group/code name (amino acid/tRNA) pairs. Even so, the whole set of translases (100 specific active sites) would be (1) worthless without ribosomes (50 proteins plus rRNA) to break the base-coded message of heredity into three-letter code names; (2) destructive without a continuously renewed supply of ATP energy [as recently shown, this is produced by ATP synthase, an enzyme containing a miniature motor, F1-ATPase.] to keep the translases from tearing up the pairs they are supposed to form; and (3) vanishing if it weren’t for having translases and other specific proteins to re-make the translase proteins that are continuously and rapidly wearing out because of the destructive effects of time and chance on protein structure!

 

One can give such descriptions some serious thought, or repeat the evolutionist’s mantra, 'But with enough time anything is possible' and change the topic real fast!

 

- Dr. Gary Parker.

[Asimov]

Dr. Kofahl, a chemist, observes:

 

‘A good example of alleged molecular homology is afforded by the a- and b-hemoglobin molecules of land vertebrates including man. These supposedly are homologous with an ancestral myoglobin molecule similar to human myoglobin. Two a- and two b-hemoglobin associate together to form the marvellous human hemoglobin molecule that carries oxygen and carbon dioxide in our blood. But myoglobin acts as single molecules to transport oxygen in our muscles. Supposedly, the ancient original myoglobin molecules slowly evolved along two paths until the precisely designed a- and b-hemoglobin molecules resulted that function only when linked together in groups of four to work in the blood in a much different way under very different conditions from myoglobin in the muscle cells. What we have today in modern myoglobin and hemoglobin molecules are marvels of perfect designs for special, highly demanding tasks. Is there any evidence that intermediate, half-evolved molecules could have served useful functions during this imaginary evolutionary change process, or that any creature could survive with them in its blood? There is no such information. Modern vertebrates can tolerate very little variation in these molecules. Thus, the supposed evolutionary history of the allegedly homologous globin molecules is a fantasy, not science.’

 

 

 

The amount of information that could be stored in a pinhead’s volume of DNA is staggering. It is the equivalent information content of a pile of paperback books 500 times as tall as the distance from Earth to the moon, each with a different, yet specific content.

 

quote:

 

‘The more time that goes by, the greater the genetic burden or genetic corruption. Natural selection can’t save us from this genetic decay, since most mutations are recessive and can sneak through a population hidden in carriers, only rarely showing up as the double recessive which can be “attacked” by natural selection. As time goes by, accumulating genetic decay threatens the very survival of plant, animal, and the human populations’.

 

- Dr. Parker again.

 

Dr. Demick, a practising pathologist, likens the activity of mutations to ‘A Blind Gunman’.

 

quote:

 

First, that the human mutation problem is bad and getting worse. Second, that it is unbalanced by any detectable positive mutations. To summarize, recent research has revealed literally tens of thousands of different mutations affecting the human genome, with a likelihood of many more yet to be characterized. These have been associated with thousands of diseases affecting every organ and tissue type in the body. In all this research, not one mutation that increased the efficiency of a genetically coded human protein has been found. Each generation has a slightly more disordered genetic constitution than the preceding one. - Demick, D.A., February 1999. The Blind Gunman.

 

All just sort of happened huh? By unguided processes huh?

 

"Anything is possible given enough time" ?? Mathematically incorrect to say the least.

 

Keep on dreamin' people..... ;-)

[BlueGiant]

Sounds like someone who is not familiar with actual science to say the least. Just likes soundbytes and hyperbole. Really not worth anyone's time.