John Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 Why are there inconsistencies in radiometric dating? If I can recall correctly rocks from the Mt. St. Helens eruption dated millions of years. The same exact results in Hawaii occured. There are many other errors I can list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpooky Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 False. http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/CD/CD013.html [Moved from mispost in "Flood Geology?" thread. -Z] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyby Stardancer Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 Read here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asimov Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 Why are there inconsistencies in radiometric dating? If I can recall correctly rocks from the Mt. St. Helens eruption dated millions of years. The same exact results in Hawaii occured. There are many other errors I can list. Mt. St. Helens....wasn't that because older rocks were in the lava flow? Same with Hawaii? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyby Stardancer Posted May 8, 2005 Share Posted May 8, 2005 Mt. St. Helens....wasn't that because older rocks were in the lava flow? Same with Hawaii? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's part of what the link I posted (that I got from MrSpooky in another thread) mentions in response to that "debate" point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurisaz Posted May 9, 2005 Share Posted May 9, 2005 Why are there inconsistencies in radiometric dating? If I can recall correctly rocks from the Mt. St. Helens eruption dated millions of years. The same exact results in Hawaii occured. There are many other errors I can list. The sources of all those "errors" (which are always blown far out of proportion by babblical cretinists) are well-known and are accounted for by the scientists. Read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts