Forums

"1. If hell exists, god cannot be omnibenevolent.  2. If hell exists, it invalidates god's omnipresence.   According to the Bible Hell exists. God is not omnibenevolent to those who disobey him. He created Hell for Lucifer, for the disobedient angels, and for all who do not follow his word. I don't believe God is omnipresent in Hell but since he created it, he has power over it, and maybe if he wished, he could destroy it or have it managed differently, The Bible doesn't talk of this.

Good question. According to the Bible God created hell as a place to ban Lucifer and his follower angels. The fire and torment part of hell is little discussed in the Bible, primarily Revelation. But Lucifer was free to tempt Eve and is accordingly free to temp sinners in the world so how is hell managed. There is much unanswered in the Bible, that's why all of God's ways and purposes are unknown, and sometimes only faith must be involved in God's purposes when all the answers are not there.

Ok, that's it for me. Next time I go for a hike in the woods I'm taking my electric flyswatter. 😉

I can't tell you how relieved I am to finally find an expert in this area! It's been plaguing me for years. So please keep going! I have many more questions...   Such as, does it take individual spraying of feathers or can it be done industrial style, like in a paint shop? Seems to me if this has to be done individually it might take the whole of the CIA to do that every day.....And what happens if it's raining too? Or the ducks have to fly through a hurricane?  Then there's this....      

http://jesusbuds.com/     The CIA sprays the feathers with WD40 each morning.     No. Those are owned by Bill Gates and are used to deliver the microchips to the vaccine manufacturers.

Non-grata, you readily concede that there are many contradictions in scripture and while I understand you do not require perfection in scripture in order to believe in God/Jesus yourself, surely you see how hard it can be to discern what is true and what is not in both the Old and New Testaments.  Surely you can see how a rational person might conclude it is all myth and fiction and that this supposed god does not even exist?   How then can you believe in and worship a good who sends non-believers to this place of eternal torment?  

I knew it all along!!! I have heard this for years and observed many different species from several parts of the US. I have even witnessed what appears to be two drones mating (very realistic!) but the question is, how do duck drones keep from getting waterlogged when they land in the water? 🤔   Does that include big flying bugs too? I have seen some that actually hover and try to stare me down before flying off. If they're not government drones, they might be spying on me for the aliens (not aliens from my own home planet though...whew). 👽   As for that last bit, I am truly speechless so I will just end by saying that you missed your calling as a writer for Saturday Night Live. 😁    

I will try to address this when I stop laughing but haven't as of yet. 🤣   (a few minutes later)   Nope...still laughing....   Hey where can I get whatever it is you're smoking? 🤔

It should also be noted that this is alleged to have happened in Gaza during the war. So let's think about this. Gaza is being destroyed, hundreds of thousands of people are running for their lives, children are starving, bombs are falling constantly, and someone has the time and means to go around and check with the Muslim population to see how many of them have dreamed of Jesus, and keep track of the reports to determine that 200 of them had the same dream on the same day. Sure.    Now it is possible because birds aren't real. They have been replaced by drones and some of those drones could have been shipped to Israel and used to surveil Muslims in Gaza. This is from the Audubon Society website so it has to be true:   The CIA assassinated John F. Kennedy after he refused to kill and replace billions of birds with drones. The U.S. government is sequestering a team of Boeing engineers in Area 51 for a secret military mission. Our tax dollars have been funneled into building the “Turkey X500,” a robot used to hunt large birds. ... [T]he CIA took out 12 billion feathered fugitives because directors within the organization were “annoyed that birds had been dropping fecal matter on their car windows.” The targets were eradicated between 1959 and 1971 with specially altered B-52 bombers stocked with poison. They were then supplanted with avian-like robots that could be used to surveil Americans.     And this is from The Guardian in an article about the guy who first sounded the alarm: He said he was part of a movement that had been around for 50 years, and was originally started to save American birds, but had failed. The “deep state” had destroyed them all, and replaced them with surveillance drones. Every bird you see is actually a tiny feathered robot watching you.   This has to be true or the Audubon Society and The Guardian wouldn't have printed it. So the answer is that the CIA, in cooperation with George Soros, who secretly converted to Catholicism, and the Trilateral Commission, sent bird-drones to Israel to use in Gaza to detect the brain waves of Muslims when they were sleeping and discover their dreams, which would facilitate the destruction of Islam and create a one-world Christian government.

You have already eschewed the bible as non-authoritative, owing to mistranslation, misinterpretation, and misapplication.  Therefore, nothing the bible says, or implies, would be accepted into evidence anyway.  If, as you have said, the bible is filled with contradictions and inconsistencies, then falsus in uno, nothing it says can be trusted.    I am not using scripture.  I am using logic, which you claimed to respect,  and which I suspect you do not actually know how to use.  Using the very first law of logic, the law of non-contradiction, I have demonstrated that:   1. If hell exists, god cannot be omnibenevolent.  2. If hell exists, it invalidates god's omnipresence.    According to the rules of logic and formal debate, your options at this point are:   A. Concede both points B. Refute both points C. Change your current position on both points D. Ignore the logic you claimed to respect and therefore contradict yourself.   I'd make it easier on you if I could; but there it is.