A forum to discuss how ex-Christians have dealt with family members, replaced the church as a place of community, reactions of your family, friends, church, acquaintances upon learning of the de-conversion, or anything else relevant to the Ex-Christian Life.
The bulk of science does not support belief in a deity, or does it? This is an open discussion area to hone your skills at supporting and understanding the various positions. Feel free to post any links of value in this important topic.
This section is confined to serious and formal debate. New topics will not appear in this section until approved by a moderator. For best results, contact a moderator before attempting to post a new topic in this section.
What's interesting is that there is an earlier ascension of Jesus described at the end of Luke, in Luke 24:50-53. This ascension in Luke took place the same day the resurrected Jesus first appears to the disciples in Jerusalem, and the ascension took place in Bethany after Jesus led them there. But the ascension in Acts 1:9-11 took place forty days after Jesus was resurrected and in Jerusalem, after he appeared on earth to the disciples during those forty days (Acts 1:3).
It appears that Jesus had two different ascensions to heaven. But there may be ways in which to harmonize the two accounts, or interpretations that these accounts both describe the same ascension. Luke and Acts were supposedly written by the same person.
50 Then he led them out as far as Bethany, and, lifting up his hands, he blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he withdrew from them and was carried up into heaven.[p] 52 And they worshiped him, and[q] returned to Jerusalem with great joy; 53 and they were continually in the temple blessing God. (NRSV)
I think my post about the US killing civilians went right over your head.
The Christians you must associate with must not read the bible. There is a reference in Revelations to the "City that sits on seven hills". This is a very clear reference to ancient Rome which had seven hills nearby (In fact the hills and Rome are still there) That's one verse - most of revelations is talking about Rome.
Nit pick please. Should have read "for over 1,000 years"
In reference to your convoluted theory of prophesy about Islam it doesn't matter.
Islamic terrorist target woman and children. The Quran says to kill infidels, not woman and children. I agree with the Quran as much as any other Ex-C here, but don't make it say something it doesn't to fit your pet theory.
I know people convinced of flat earth too - your conviction means nothing. If you can't show it to be true, then its not evidently true.
... and then shoehorn in whatever events are currently happening. 2,000 years ago you would have been pointing at Rome, if you were born 300 years in the future it would be whatever situation is happening then.
I'm calling horseshit on your bullshit. IF you did say anything I'll bet is was so vague that you could interpret anything to fit it... like most bible prophesy. Like all prophesy you have an event then claim you prophesied it.
You do realize this is not prophesy right? I'm not sure who you are trying to impress but anyone in today's current world events can predict terrorist events. The chances are you are right. Why don't you use your bible prophesy to tell us the next major terroist event with DETAILS.
If you had posted several weeks ago that A man named Salman Abedi would blow up the Ariana Grande concert in Manchester and 22 people would die THEN I would believe some amazing future telling abilities.
Meanwhile I'm predicting a large earthquake to strike this year... probably in June or July. This is the earthquake from revelations "And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake"
We'll tally up on August 1 and see who is the most prophetic shall we?
Your the one that is to delusional to realise that the Hebrew word for mingle is Arab, and that the Hebrews had a similar word that they would have used for Arabians themselves. But the specific meaning of the word you ran with is in fact mingle just as it says in the bible. If you asked a jew to write down "mingle" in Hebrew then it would probable be "Arab" every time. You took a word out of context and ran with it to develope a whole line of bullshit. Nothing new. Been done for years. Blah blah blah. If I'm not smart according to your standards then you are completely fucked in the head according to mine.